User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
This PR changes the name of the Custom HTML module to simply custom which better reflects its usage as it can be used for more than simple HTML.
Some languages (eg french) have not used the name Custom HTML for quite some time.
This change is a proposal from the en-GB working groups see joomla/user-interface-text#18
I have updated the language files AND the sample data files to reflect this change. I have not updated the csv files in the test suite as I am not 100% confident in doing that - perhaps @rdeutz or one of the other unit test team can update that
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Category | ⇒ | Language & Strings UI/UX |
Easy | No | ⇒ | Yes |
Title |
|
In the csv file of the tests it is looking for "custom html"
On 23 March 2015 at 15:29, Robert Deutz notifications@github.com wrote:
What test did you expect to fail?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#6555 (comment).
Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/
Maybe replace "create" with "code".
In fact, we do not need No BOM anymore in 3.x as parse_ini does not need it.
See: https://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/blob/staging/libraries/joomla/language/language.php#L869
moved the BOM discussion to a new issue out of courtesy to this PR.
Aplpied the patch. The name of the Custom HTML modulke is correctly changed to "Custom" in the list of available moduels when adding a new module. But the Module Manager screen still shows " Module Manager: Module Custom HTML" as page heading and the title above the editor area still shows "Custom HTML".
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Thanks for testing @erikvandoorne I missed that one - now fixed
Milestone |
Added: |
Change in string missing in the ini file (should be I guess similar to the sys.ini)
in brianteeman@4225b1c#diff-f3d6a1d2248277bf7cd4e7f59db211c2R9
would this need creating update sql?
@infograf768 Can you explain where the update SQL should be needed for? I don't see any database changes that are needed.
Simon it is deliberately not "content" as it is used for many thing that
are not HTML or content eg a JavaScript snippet
On 6 Jun 2015 15:00, "RolandD" notifications@github.com wrote:
@infograf768 https://github.com/infograf768 Can you explain where the
update SQL should be needed for? I don't see any database changes that are
needed.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#6555 (comment).
I meant that this PR has not changed the .ini values as it did for the sys.ini ones IN BACKEND html module
In the sys.ini we now have:
MOD_CUSTOM="Custom"
MOD_CUSTOM_XML_DESCRIPTION="This module allows you to create your own Module using a WYSIWYG editor."
MOD_CUSTOM_LAYOUT_DEFAULT="Default"
in the .ini we still have:
MOD_CUSTOM="Custom HTML"
MOD_CUSTOM_FIELD_PREPARE_CONTENT_DESC="Optionally prepare the content with Joomla Content Plugins."
MOD_CUSTOM_FIELD_PREPARE_CONTENT_LABEL="Prepare Content"
MOD_CUSTOM_XML_DESCRIPTION="This module allows you to create your own HTML Module using a WYSIWYG editor."
Thanks @infograf768 not sure what happened with the PR - the change was there in my local branch but not in the PR. It is now
merge conflicts in front-end ini
Merge conflicts resolved
I have tested this item successfully on 16ec1d9
At Test works
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Ready to Commit |
Labels |
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Status | Ready to Commit | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2015-10-25 11:32:13 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | roland-d |
Labels |
Removed:
?
|
What test did you expect to fail?