User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
I've moved the forked flying-focus repo into a new one and started utilising grunt.
This PR simply replaces the old package with the new one
Category | ⇒ | JavaScript Repository Administration Templates (admin) Front End Templates (site) |
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Labels |
Added:
?
|
I don't really mind what gets used tbh
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2017-10-24 08:46:28 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | C-Lodder |
flyingfocus was much more than just the outline
@brianteeman what do you mean? Flying focus is a visual effect on top of the focus ring, what else was there?
it does the flying part - the transition - which is very useful to indicate where the focus has been moved to without having to search the screen for just the outline
Ok, so it's just the visual effect, which might not be that inclusive after all (for those with good vision the effect is a nice hint, but I guess for some visually impaired people the animation might be really annoying or not even visible). Anyways I'm not against flying focus if we first implement the css4 focus-ring (with the provided polyfill ATM)
if it is good enough for webaim.org then it should be good enough for joomla ;)
I guess webaim.org is not using Bootstrap (which totally messes the focus ring). So in fact my proposal for css4 focus ring is more a patch to this annoying approach of BS4's outline: 0;
and you can still have the sugar (effect) on top of it, if that is needed
I dont know why this was closed. The fix is required
I closed this in favour of a better approach
@wilsonge conflicts fixed. Please merge when possible