Add a new PR with a title and in the description add an emoticon
Description with emoticon code or an icon
The description breaks at the first emoticon and no further text gets in the database
PR: joomla/joomla-cms#5058
Tracker: http://issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/5058
Labels |
Added:
bug
|
@dgt41 I've just tested and everything is good. See the prove:
PR jtester/tests#50
Tracker http://issues.joomla.org/tracker/jtests/50
Seems to be ok now. I will close this one
Status | New | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2015-01-11 21:03:29 |
Ok I came across to this problem once again!
I realize that the problem isn’t the bot but maybe the editor of jissues?
Anyway these are two links and two images that show the problem
on github joomla/joomla-cms#5815
And on jissues http://issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/5815
As you can see on Jissues nothing gets parsed after the emoticon!
Status | Closed | ⇒ | New |
My two hunches right now are that our controller isn't handling filtering it very well (which may mean an issue in Joomla/Filter) or the GitHub API isn't handling it very well. To debug, I'd suggest dumping the data just before we send a request to the API to render the markdown data and see what the description field contains. If it's good before that point, then that seems to point to either a GitHub API issue or an issue with Joomla/GitHub and Joomla/HTTP and handling the request for that; whereas if it is missing content before that point then it would seem to point to a filtering issue.
but in description add an emoticon with its Unicode
May be this is the problem. I will try to reproduce.
Ah ok got it now.
Can the database not handle the characters that are getting printed after the closing tag? The table is defined with a utf8 charset, the columns in question are utf8_general_ci collation and utf8 encoded.
Seems so. I trying to Google for it, but nothing found at the moment.
Isn't this a filtering problem? My guess is tha <g-emoji
is not a valid, known tag in the filters and thus rejected.
It wouldn't make it to the database if there were a filtering problem.
We're on 5.6 on the server.
I don't see an issue with it.
Then close it
How about a PR to update the default schema to use the utf8mb4
character set
Status | New | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 2015-01-11 21:03:29 | ⇒ | 2015-04-11 10:33:57 |
So with any luck,
Do we have more details on it?