Is it possible to get the month in two digits format ? Not 7 for example, but 07, like 2014-07-15 ?

Found on stackoverflow that ("0" + (.getMonth() + 1)).slice(-2) might help.

I’m on this now;)

BTW, do we need the date to be two digit?

Fo
-- 
Allen Zhao
Sent with Airmail

On July 15, 2014 at 12:23:58 PM, Dmitry Rekun (notifications@github.com) wrote:

Is it possible to get the month in two digits format ? Not 7 for example, but 07, like 2014-07-15 ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

May be not, I do not insist :)

Best regards,
Dmitry

----- Reply message -----
From: "Zehan Zhao" notifications@github.com
To: "joomla/jissues" jissues@noreply.github.com
Subject: [jissues] Quick fix (#380)
Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2014 07:35
Found on stackoverflow that ("0" + (.getMonth() + 1)).slice(-2) might help.

I’m on this now;)

BTW, do we need the date to be two digit?

Fo

-- 

Allen Zhao

Sent with Airmail

On July 15, 2014 at 12:23:58 PM, Dmitry Rekun (notifications@github.com) wrote:

Is it possible to get the month in two digits format ? Not 7 for example, but 07, like 2014-07-15 ?

—

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Hmm, date is not two digits. For me it looks a little bit ugly :)

BTW you made two digits on month not date? :)

Yes, I thought you meant month.
Then I will implement on month too.
You may blame the J!Tracker Application for transmitting this comment.

One more bug in Firefox - time is displayed as NaN-NaN-NaN

Please see this discussion how to fix it.

Hmm, to avoid this, shall I do it on the server side?
In 4ec3acd, I converted the date to what we need.

Seems like there's an error for the Travis CI build on the composer...
See here

I see. Not a problem. Sync with the master (some changes were made) and will see how it goes.

Travis has its ups and downs... I had to relaunch it on master multiple times for some PRs.
I have no permission to do it on this repo.

Restarted...
Those Travis "failures" are really annoying. We should use our own Pull Tester again