User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Labels |
Added:
?
|
unfortunately for strict sql we cannot
cause they are listed in the select clause
..."uc"."name" AS "editor","ag"."title" AS "access_level"
...
ok. Also nothing critical as the id (i have not see that bevor) is still on the top ;) I can try testing this later.
Category | ⇒ | Postgresql |
Easy | No | ⇒ | Yes |
i've followed the order defined in the SELECT clause
SELECT
"a"."id","a"."name","a"."alias","a"."checked_out","a"."checked_out_time","a"."catid","a"."user_id","a"."published","a"."access","a"."created","a"."created_by","a"."ordering","a"."featured","a"."language","a"."publish_up","a"."publish_down",
"ul"."name" AS "linked_user",
"ul"."email",
"l"."title" AS "language_title",
"uc"."name" AS "editor",
"ag"."title" AS "access_level","c"."title" AS "category_title"
I have tested this item successfully on 17da637
Thanks alikon!
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2015-11-05 14:32:22 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | wilsonge |
Merged on code review (having done a bunch of these PR's for 3.4 myself :P)
Milestone |
Added: |
@alikon is it required to have this ordering or can we move this:
to the top of the group by? (as it was bevor) and than the others above this lines?