User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
If this doesn't get your attention, you might want to check your pulse.
This is the second attempt at RFC for this DESIGN, so please comment on the design.
Commenting about the implementation of a POC is very frustrating because it takes the discussion off topic.
So let's acknowledge that coding styles are completely subjective and agree to disagree on such matters.
The reason I'm requesting comments is to identify possible limitations of this DESIGN that should be given greater consideration.
As such, a constructive comment would first fully grasp the MVSC design, then describe a specific requirement in which this design would make the implementation of the requirement more difficult than it is using Legacy MVC.
I know there are a lot of mature frameworks like FOF or RedCore out there.
I have no doubt that there are lots of libraries out there with tons of features already built, but MVSC isn't about RAD, it is about flexibility, stability and simplicity.
Since the motivations behind MVSC are very different from RAD frameworks, please refrain from illogical comparisons.
Last RFC I heard a lot of "We could do better with xyz library" type comments, but such comparisons are like comparing a Jet Ski to a Ocean Liner. Just because they both float does not make the comparison logical.
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Category | ⇒ | Libraries |
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2015-09-25 13:17:32 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | Mathewlenning |