?

User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:

avatar Mathewlenning
Mathewlenning
14 Mar 2015

If this doesn't get your attention, you might want to check your pulse.

One Request

This is the second attempt at RFC for this DESIGN, so please comment on the design.

Commenting about the implementation of a POC is very frustrating because it takes the discussion off topic.

So let's acknowledge that coding styles are completely subjective and agree to disagree on such matters.

Constructive Comments

The reason I'm requesting comments is to identify possible limitations of this DESIGN that should be given greater consideration.

As such, a constructive comment would first fully grasp the MVSC design, then describe a specific requirement in which this design would make the implementation of the requirement more difficult than it is using Legacy MVC.

3RD party libraries

I know there are a lot of mature frameworks like FOF or RedCore out there.

I have no doubt that there are lots of libraries out there with tons of features already built, but MVSC isn't about RAD, it is about flexibility, stability and simplicity.

Since the motivations behind MVSC are very different from RAD frameworks, please refrain from illogical comparisons.

Last RFC I heard a lot of "We could do better with xyz library" type comments, but such comparisons are like comparing a Jet Ski to a Ocean Liner. Just because they both float does not make the comparison logical.

Thank you for your participation

avatar Mathewlenning Mathewlenning - open - 14 Mar 2015
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 14 Mar 2015
Labels Added: ?
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - change - 6 Aug 2015
Category Libraries
avatar Mathewlenning Mathewlenning - change - 25 Sep 2015
Status Pending Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2015-09-25 13:17:32
Closed_By Mathewlenning
avatar Mathewlenning Mathewlenning - close - 25 Sep 2015

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment