?
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman
27 Jan 2015

The post installation messages are displayed with an order of
ORDER BY "postinstall_message_id" ASC

This means that the newer messages are always at the bottom

avatar brianteeman brianteeman - open - 27 Jan 2015
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - change - 28 Jan 2015
Labels Added: ?
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 29 Jan 2015

@nikosdion I wouldnt want to touch your code ;) hint hint


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/5896.
avatar nikosdion
nikosdion - comment - 30 Jan 2015

This is intentional, not a bug. The older messages need to be displayed FIRST because they were added FIRST. It is a FIFO buffer. When you've read a message you can either hide it (using the Hide button) or act upon it by clicking the other button (the label is up to the developer). It makes no sense whatsoever to show messages in the reverse order. In a new Joomla! installation you think it'd make more sense to be shown a message about upgrading your passwords to bcrypt and then shown a welcome to Joomla! message (as you propose) or vice versa (as I've implemented it)?

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 30 Jan 2015

I see what you are saying and it is logical - except in this common scenario

User has built 10 sites with 3.3 - they are familiar with the messages so
when they build their next site they dont read any more and just click hide
on all of them or just ignore it completely

Now when they install 3.4 they see the exact same messages - the new ones
are below the fold. Assume that there is nothing new and just ignore them
all or blindly hide all the messages. They dont notice that there is a new
message introduced for 3.4 so the aim of the messages is lost.

Our brains recognise familiar patterns and act based on those patterns.

On 30 January 2015 at 09:41, Nicholas K. Dionysopoulos <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

This is intentional, not a bug. The older messages need to be displayed
FIRST because they were added FIRST. It is a FIFO buffer. When you've read
a message you can either hide it (using the Hide button) or act upon it by
clicking the other button (the label is up to the developer). It makes no
sense whatsoever to show messages in the reverse order. In a new Joomla!
installation you think it'd make more sense to be shown a message about
upgrading your passwords to bcrypt and then shown a welcome to Joomla!
message (as you propose) or vice versa (as I've implemented it)?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5896 (comment).

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

avatar nikosdion
nikosdion - comment - 30 Jan 2015

So you have a way to read the user's mind and tell my code which messages this person is familiar with? Because both methods have obvious problems for a different demographic: mine for the power user who had built dozens of sites, yours for the new user. We can't cater for both and the one which really needs to read the messages is the newcomer.

Moreover the person who has built dozen of sites will also update at least one of his J 3.2 or 3.3 sites to 3.4. Therefore he will see the new message and figure out it applies to all sites.

So from where I am standing it makes more sense to leave it as it is now.=

avatar brianteeman brianteeman - close - 30 Jan 2015
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - close - 30 Jan 2015
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - change - 30 Jan 2015
Status New Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2015-01-30 10:03:29
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 30 Jan 2015

Not worth a long debate

On 30 January 2015 at 09:59, Nicholas K. Dionysopoulos <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

So you have a way to read the user's mind and tell my code which messages
this person is familiar with? Because both methods have obvious problems
for a different demographic: mine for the power user who had built dozens
of sites, yours for the new user. We can't cater for both and the one which
really needs to read the messages is the newcomer.

Moreover the person who has built dozen of sites will also update at least
one of his J 3.2 or 3.3 sites to 3.4. Therefore he will see the new message
and figure out it applies to all sites.

So from where I am standing it makes more sense to leave it as it is now.=


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5896 (comment).

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment