[#47887] - [7.0] Inject Mailerfactory into multiauth EMail
- Fixed in Code Base
- 6 Jun 2026
- Medium
- Build: 7.0-dev
- # 47887
- Diff
- Digital-Peak:replace/multimailer
User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
- I read the Generative AI policy and my contribution is either not created with the help of AI or is compatible with the policy and GNU/GPL 2 or later.
Summary of Changes
Replaces the deprecated Factory::getMailer() in the multi authentication email plugin with the injected mailer factory.
Testing Instructions
- In the file /plugins/multifactorauth/email/src/Extension/Email.php replace line 555 with
$didSend = false; - Log in on the front end
- Got to /index.php?option=com_users&view=profile
- Click "Edit profile"
- Scroll down and click on "Add a new Code by Email"
Actual result BEFORE applying this Pull Request
Authentication code is sent.
Expected result AFTER applying this Pull Request
Authentication code is sent.
Link to documentations
Please select:
-
Documentation link for guide.joomla.org:
-
No documentation changes for guide.joomla.org needed
-
Pull Request link for manual.joomla.org:
-
No documentation changes for manual.joomla.org needed
![avatar github-actions[bot]](/images/avatars/github-actions[bot].png)
| Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
joomla-cms-bot
- | Category | ⇒ | Front End Plugins |
| Labels |
Added:
PR-7.0-dev
|
||
| Category | Front End Plugins | ⇒ | Front End Plugins JavaScript Unit Tests |
| Labels |
Added:
Unit/System Tests
|
||
As part of this sprint I did it here.
I would add this to 6.2 if possible. There is no backward incompatible change here, and less deprecated code from core.
Rebasing would be too much work. I leave it here.
I have tested this item ✅ successfully on c6fd8d6
Looks good to me
This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/47887.
I have tested this item ✅ successfully on c6fd8d6
Looks good to me
This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/47887.
| Status | Pending | ⇒ | Fixed in Code Base |
| Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2026-06-06 12:34:42 |
| Closed_By | ⇒ | laoneo |
Any reason we could not have this in 6.2? We should uses less deprecated code in our core code as much as possible.