User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Pull Request resolves #
This PR introduces a “Copy to Clipboard” feature for the Articles admin list view.
The goal is to improve admin productivity and make it easier to share or use article links and IDs. This change only affects the UI and does not modify any existing functionality.
Documentation link for guide.joomla.org:
Pull Request link for manual.joomla.org:
| Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
| Category | ⇒ | JavaScript Administration com_content |
@SRV-KILLER09 New features should always be in the 6.2 branch at this time. See the information here for selecting the branch in the readme. It will probably save you time if you first determine if the feature would be acceptable by reading and following this first #46934
What is the use case for this. Sorry I don't get it
So basically the main goal is to make it quicker for site administrators to copy article IDs or links...with a single click, you can share a link, reference an ID in a support request, or use it in a custom extension & no need to open the article or manually select text.
I know its a very small change, but it might save some time on everyday admin tasks..
one of the problems is that sharing a link might not work if the person getting the link doesnt have the access to see it.
one of the problems is that sharing a link might not work if the person getting the link doesnt have the access to see it.
To address this, I’d like to propose a “temporary access” feature for our Joomla! Community...Basically this would generate a secure, time limited link to a restricted article, allowing access for a defined duration or number of uses before expiring automatically.
Similar to WordPress’s public preview, this could support urgent support, ticketing, and editorial workflows, while maintaining security through proper controls and audit logs...
I’m happy to help prototype this if there’s interest.
I’m happy to help prototype this if there’s interest.
Thats why you should make it a proposal as part of the new feature approval process I linked to previously. You might also want to spend some time looking at a previous attempt at something similar #12009
Thank you for the guidance! I’ll review the previous attempt (#12009) and will follow the new feature approval process to draft a proper proposal for this idea. Thankyou so much once again!
@SRV-KILLER09 As @brianteeman said, it is not a bug fix but a new feature, so the 5.4-dev branch is definitely the wrong target branch.
Please rebase to 6.2-dev or close.
Thanks in advance.
@SRV-KILLER09 As @brianteeman said, it is not a bug fix but a new feature, so the 5.4-dev branch is definitely the wrong target branch.
Please rebase to 6.2-dev or close.
Thanks in advance.
The base branch has been updated to 6.2-dev as requested.
| Title |
|
||||||
| Category | JavaScript Administration com_content | ⇒ | Repository JavaScript Administration com_content com_media NPM Change Installation Language & Strings Front End Plugins |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.
| Status | Pending | ⇒ | Closed |
| Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2026-03-31 07:24:29 |
| Closed_By | ⇒ | SRV-KILLER09 | |
| Labels |
Added:
Feature
Language Change
Conflicting Files
NPM Resource Changed
PR-5.4-dev
PR-6.2-dev
|
||
What is the use case for this. Sorry I don't get it