User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Pull Request for Issue #44292 .
Some of the logTasks are translated and some are hard coded.
Code review
Please select:
Documentation link for docs.joomla.org:
No documentation changes for docs.joomla.org needed
Pull Request link for manual.joomla.org:
No documentation changes for manual.joomla.org needed
| Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
| Category | ⇒ | Administration Language & Strings Front End Plugins |
| Title |
|
||||||
The new language strings mean it's not something for a patch release afaik
The new language strings mean it's not something for a patch release afaik
@brianteeman Yes, that could be, and that would mean it's for 6.1-dev. I will clarify and let you know the result. If it is good for a patch release it also can be done for 5.4-dev.
btw i did try to rebase to 6.1 but it looks like 6.1 is a long way behind 6.0 at the moment so will leave it here for now
| Labels |
Added:
Language Change
PR-6.0-dev
|
||
@brianteeman The maintainer team has discussed and agreed that it should be made for 6.1-dev. After the next upmerge from 6.0-dev to 6.1-dev rebasing will be better. A clean rebase will not require new tests if the PR got some human tests in the meantime.
@brianteeman The maintainer team has discussed and agreed that it should be made for 6.1-dev. After the next upmerge from 6.0-dev to 6.1-dev rebasing will be better. A clean rebase will not require new tests if the PR got some human tests in the meantime.
Upmerge done (thanks @richard67 ) with PR #46384
@tecpromotion I guess you mean „done“ and not „down“.
| Title |
|
||||||
Rebased to 6.1
#<?php die('Forbidden.'); ?>
#Date: 2025-10-31 13:27:11 UTC
#Software: Joomla! 6.0.1-dev+pr.46375 Development [ Kuimarisha ] 14-October-2025 16:01 UTC
#Fields: date time priority message
2025-10-31 13:27:11 INFO Task> Delete Logs after 1 days
2025-10-31 13:27:11 INFO Task> Delete Logs end
If you set it to 1 day, it still says days. But that was already the case before.
I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 389e4e8
I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 389e4e8
| Status | Pending | ⇒ | Ready to Commit |
| Build | 6.0-dev | ⇒ | 6.1-dev |
RTC
| Labels |
Added:
RTC
PR-6.1-dev
Removed: PR-6.0-dev |
||
| Status | Ready to Commit | ⇒ | Fixed in Code Base |
| Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2025-11-03 17:09:02 |
| Closed_By | ⇒ | tecpromotion | |
| Labels |
Added:
Feature
|
||
Thanks @brianteeman
Thanks
@brianteeman If it's a bug which affects both 5.4 and 6.0, it should be made for 5.4-dev, and if it's a bug which affects only 6.x it should be made for 6.0-dev, and if it counts as a new feature it should be made for 6.1-dev.
The referred issue was flagged as bug.
If you want I can ask maintainers for opinions regarding feature or not.