User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
This PR adds a tour that highlights new features introduced in Joomla 6.0.
Download the update package, not the full install as the tour is only available on updates!
It is possible to find the tour in the list of tours at the top of the Joomla dashboard and run it manually.
Make sure you see images when running the tour (on the first step only) and when editing the tour (System -> Manage -> Guided tours).
No tour highlighting new features for Joomla 6.0.
What’s New in Joomla 6.0! tour is available.
Please select:
Documentation link for docs.joomla.org:
No documentation changes for docs.joomla.org needed
Pull Request link for manual.joomla.org:
No documentation changes for manual.joomla.org needed
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Category | ⇒ | SQL Administration com_admin Postgresql Language & Strings Repository NPM Change |
Featured Articles menu is still present
Labels |
Added:
Language Change
NPM Resource Changed
PR-6.0-dev
Guided Tours
|
the font changes were made 2 years ago in 5.0
I have updated the text to show 'font sizes' rather than 'font'.
Featured Articles menu is still present
Indeed, but it points to the Articles view.
I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 83f4697
I have tested this successfully with Martin and Olivier watching during PBF ;)
1 small text update:
just 1 thing proposal:
Joomla! 6 supports automated updates for better security and performance. --->
Joomla! 6 supports automated updates with TUF for better security and performance.
(the TUF link should open in a new tab)
watching someone else is not a test
watching someone else is not a test
In case, it was confusing, I was doing the test.
Shouk,d we be adding that link - they dont list Joomla as an adopter https://theupdateframework.io/community/adoptions/
Shouk,d we be adding that link - they dont list Joomla as an adopter https://theupdateframework.io/community/adoptions/
@brianteeman Possibly because we are using our fork and not the original? Is that correct, @SniperSister ?
If so then we shouldn't use that link but something else perhaps in the JCM
the font changes were made 2 years ago in 5.0