Testing the JobPosting scheme and I see that none of the fields are required.
However google says that come of them are required and without those values the richdata will not be used.
I am sure the same is probably true for other schematype
Labels |
Added:
No Code Attached Yet
|
Title |
|
Well Google disagrees with you
https://search.google.com/test/rich-results/result/r%2Frecipes?id=O-tc1VQwwIBxp8lywxuMBw
google disagree with me that the plugin could be improved? or that goolge has it's on interpretation of schema.org because it needs information so it can create rich snipped based on schema.org data which is unrelated to google services?
I really don't know what you want from me. if something is wrong and you can fix it please do it. thanks
whoever said I wanted something from you
since I'm responsible for the 5.0 release and it's tagged for 5.0 and it's a feature I merged I and you talk to me in all comments I would expect you still talk to me, doesn't mean I'm the only one who can response of course.
Google does it's own thing that mostly overlaps with schema.org
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/job-posting#structured-data-type-definitions for example for job postings here google tells you what is required and what is recommended
Labels |
Added:
Feature
|
This is a bug not a feature
Labels |
Added:
bug
Removed: Feature |
I don't see any fields marked as required. https://schema.org/JobPosting
But improving the plugins is of course appreciated