User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Pull Request for Issue #40408 .
Use the official translation files
Run npm ci
and check that changing the language in tinyMCE still works as before
Please select:
Documentation link for docs.joomla.org:
No documentation changes for docs.joomla.org needed
Pull Request link for manual.joomla.org:
No documentation changes for manual.joomla.org needed
A note here: this could be alternative done as a GitHub action similar to the Joomla languages with the benefit that there will not be an additional nom dependency for the adm-zip
module and also keep the tools execution time shorter...
Category | ⇒ | JavaScript Repository Language & Strings NPM Change |
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Labels |
Added:
Language Change
NPM Resource Changed
PR-5.0-dev
|
Category | JavaScript Repository Language & Strings NPM Change | ⇒ | Unit Tests JavaScript Repository Language & Strings NPM Change |
done, but can we do it finally in a separate PR?
Sure, I wanted to see what's the real impact on the npm ci
with the additional fetch/unzip/minification of the files...
Should we not load it through npm https://github.com/mklkj/tinymce-i18n?
Should we not load it through npm https://github.com/mklkj/tinymce-i18n?
Personally I'm against depending on a random developer for something that essentially is done in the same way: https://github.com/mklkj/tinymce-i18n/blob/a62cd4a29fe10d85aaefe6062abd10fc6cbfd938/update.sh#L3
FWIW maybe you can create a tinyMCE-languages under Joomla-projects and I can create a similar automation (the point here is security, ownership, bus factor, etc). But if people are ok with pulling random packages then I can change the nom-tools to use that package...
I think we should move this to https://github.com/joomla/core-translations and download directly from upstream should be preferred instead of downloading from a random source.
I think we should move this to https://github.com/joomla/core-translations and download directly from upstream should be preferred instead of downloading from a random source.
If this is the decision then create a v5 branch (or call it whatever you like) in the core-translations repo and I will patch things there and correct the PR here
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2023-05-06 22:20:02 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | dgrammatiko | |
Labels |
Added:
?
|
@HLeithner @Hackwar can someone approve the node version bump to v18 on the drone for v5?
FWIW v16 (currently used) will be EOL by the time v5 will be released: https://github.com/nodejs/Release/blob/main/schedule.svg