bug Small PR-4.4-dev Pending

User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:

avatar Kaushik1216
Kaushik1216
18 Feb 2023

Pull Request for Issue #39811

Summary of Changes

change regular expression of Search email and patttern

Testing Instructions

use any language email for cloaking

Actual result BEFORE applying this Pull Request

All language email not cloaked

Expected result AFTER applying this Pull Request

All language email will cloaked

Link to documentations

Please select:

  • Documentation link for docs.joomla.org:

  • No documentation changes for docs.joomla.org needed

  • Pull Request link for manual.joomla.org:

  • No documentation changes for manual.joomla.org needed

Votes

# of Users Experiencing Issue
2/2
Average Importance Score
5.00

avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 18 Feb 2023
Category Front End Plugins
avatar Kaushik1216 Kaushik1216 - open - 18 Feb 2023
avatar Kaushik1216 Kaushik1216 - change - 18 Feb 2023
Status New Pending
avatar LukasHH
LukasHH - comment - 21 Feb 2023

You are welcome to try my suggestion, which does not have so many changes and is more reliable in these examples.
My suggestion: https://regex101.com/r/1wQv4v/1

image

Your suggestion: https://regex101.com/r/mOVnlL/1

image

We have to be careful with this, because many other versions of email addresses are handled in the file. These must all continue to work afterwards. Otherwise we have again quite many new Issius to it.

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 21 Feb 2023

a@b is a valid email address (intranets) but it fails both of the regex above

avatar LukasHH
LukasHH - comment - 21 Feb 2023

Do these email addresses need to be cloaked in intranets? Isn't it much more a protection against spam or abuse from the outside?

avatar Kaushik1216
Kaushik1216 - comment - 21 Feb 2023

@LukasHH @richard67 with your regular expression email that contain only latin latters before @ will accepted
so replacing this with p{L} take care for that
is this fine if we change regular expression to :

"([\p{L}.'-+]+@(?:[a-z0-9.-\p{L}]+.)+(?:[a-zA-Z0-9-\p{L}]{2,24}))";

we can also short this regular expression to

"([\p{L}.'-+]+@(?:[.-\p{L}]+.)+(?:[-\p{L}]{2,24}))";

as p{L} accept all alphnumaric character no need to specify other like a-z0-9 and a-zA-Z0-9

avatar LukasHH
LukasHH - comment - 21 Feb 2023

OK - that's better. But the special characters must be escaped.
([\p{L}.\'\-\+]+\@(?:[\.\-\p{L}]+.)+(?:[\-\p{L}]{2,24}))

avatar Kaushik1216 Kaushik1216 - change - 22 Feb 2023
Labels Added: ?
avatar Kaushik1216
Kaushik1216 - comment - 22 Feb 2023

@LukasHH @richard67 please test it !

avatar viocassel viocassel - test_item - 23 Feb 2023 - Tested successfully
avatar viocassel
viocassel - comment - 23 Feb 2023

I have tested this item successfully on 02e6a09


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/39888.

avatar LukasHH
LukasHH - comment - 23 Feb 2023

Please test all variants that the plugin covers and have already occurred. This change affects all variants.
I have here an example code to test, which you can copy in a new article about source code.

https://github.com/LukasHH/other-test/blob/main/email_cloaking_test_source.html

The change is still running on errors. Especially because of the wrong brackets.
Here is an example, the test page with the sample code.
https://j4-test.it-conserv.de/test/issiu

avatar Globulopolis
Globulopolis - comment - 23 Feb 2023

Please test all variants that the plugin covers and have already occurred. This change affects all variants.
I have here an example code to test, which you can copy in a new article about source code.

even with the fixed regexp some tests failed. Tests 17, 18, 19 have a wrong email(partial) in both a and b. 20 - emails not cloaked in unordered list and between <p>. Failed test 21 related to #39786

avatar Globulopolis
Globulopolis - comment - 24 Feb 2023
avatar LukasHH
LukasHH - comment - 27 Feb 2023

Please check my suggestion. In my tests this worked without any problems.

row 71 (add u at the end of the pattern)
$pattern = '~(?:<a ([^>]*)href\s*=\s*"mailto:' . $link . '"([^>]*))>' . $text . '</a>~iu';

row 106 (replace the pattern)
$searchEmail = "([\p{L}\p{N}\.\'\-\+]+\@(?:[\.\-\p{L}\p{N}]+\.)+(?:[\-\p{L}\p{N}]{2,24}))";

row 444 (add u at the end of the pattern)
$pattern = '~<[^<]*(?<!\/)>(*SKIP)(*F)|<[^>]+?(\w*=\"' . $searchEmail . '\")[^>]*\/>~iu';

row 458 (add ~ at the start and ~iu at the end of the pattern)
$pattern = '~(<[^>]+?(\w*=\"' . $searchEmail . '")[^>]*>[^<]+<[^<]+>)~iu';

row 474 (add u at the end of the pattern)
$pattern = '~<[^<]*(?<!\/)>(*SKIP)(*F)|' . $searchEmail . '~iu';

This should support all variants with unicode characters.

avatar Hackwar Hackwar - change - 28 Feb 2023
Labels Added: ?
avatar Kaushik1216
Kaushik1216 - comment - 28 Feb 2023

Please check my suggestion. In my tests this worked without any problems.

row 71 (add u at the end of the pattern) $pattern = '~(?:<a ([^>]*)href\s*=\s*"mailto:' . $link . '"([^>]*))>' . $text . '</a>~iu';

row 106 (replace the pattern) $searchEmail = "([\p{L}\p{N}\.\'\-\+]+\@(?:[\.\-\p{L}\p{N}]+\.)+(?:[\-\p{L}\p{N}]{2,24}))";

row 444 (add u at the end of the pattern) $pattern = '~<[^<]*(?<!\/)>(*SKIP)(*F)|<[^>]+?(\w*=\"' . $searchEmail . '\")[^>]*\/>~iu';

row 458 (add ~ at the start and ~iu at the end of the pattern) $pattern = '~(<[^>]+?(\w*=\"' . $searchEmail . '")[^>]*>[^<]+<[^<]+>)~iu';

row 474 (add u at the end of the pattern) $pattern = '~<[^<]*(?<!\/)>(*SKIP)(*F)|' . $searchEmail . '~iu';

This should support all variants with unicode characters.

ok I will do

avatar Kaushik1216
Kaushik1216 - comment - 1 Mar 2023

@LukasHH thanks you for helping me .Please test it !

avatar Globulopolis Globulopolis - test_item - 22 Apr 2023 - Tested successfully
avatar Globulopolis
Globulopolis - comment - 22 Apr 2023

I have tested this item successfully on 4b7d613


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/39888.

avatar HLeithner
HLeithner - comment - 2 May 2023

This pull request has been automatically rebased to 4.3-dev.

avatar HLeithner
HLeithner - comment - 30 Sep 2023

This pull request has been automatically rebased to 4.4-dev.

avatar den1ska07 den1ska07 - test_item - 24 Feb 2024 - Tested successfully
avatar den1ska07
den1ska07 - comment - 24 Feb 2024

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 4b7d613


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/39888.

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 24 Feb 2024

Unfortunately the PR has a conflict in file plugins/content/emailcloak/emailcloak.php which cannot be resolved with the GitHub UI so it needs to be done locally in a git clone.

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 25 Feb 2024

The conflict comes from the emailcloak plugin having been converted to the new structure in 4.4-dev meanwhile. I will see if I can fix that.

avatar richard67 richard67 - change - 25 Feb 2024
Labels Added: PBF bug Small PR-4.4-dev
Removed: ? ?
avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 25 Feb 2024

Conflict solved.

avatar Quy Quy - change - 25 Feb 2024
Labels Removed: PBF
avatar HLeithner HLeithner - change - 24 Apr 2024
Title
Email cloak plugin fails for emails with IDN
[4.4] Email cloak plugin fails for emails with IDN
avatar HLeithner HLeithner - edited - 24 Apr 2024
avatar HLeithner
HLeithner - comment - 15 Nov 2024

This pull request has been automatically rebased to 5.2-dev.

avatar HLeithner HLeithner - change - 15 Nov 2024
Title
[4.4] Email cloak plugin fails for emails with IDN
[5.2] Email cloak plugin fails for emails with IDN
avatar HLeithner HLeithner - edited - 15 Nov 2024

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment