@alikon I think you will have to adapt the API tests to that because they are failing in Drone: https://ci.joomla.org/joomla/joomla-cms/44217/1/25

@alikon A quick search for v1/content/article on a 4.0-dev branch shows 1 more place which needs to be changed:

https://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/blob/4.0-dev/api/components/com_content/src/Serializer/ContentSerializer.php#L46

@alikon And looking for /content/articleshows 3 more places in tests to be changed:

./tests/Codeception/api/com_content/ContentCest.php:86:         $I->sendGET('/content/article/1');
./tests/Codeception/api/BasicCest.php:66:               $I->sendGET('/content/article/1');
./tests/Codeception/api/BasicCest.php:83:               $I->sendGET('/content/article/1');

thanks @richard67 one of these day maybe i'll need to set codeception ?

There is nothing more reliable than a search on command line.

On Linux: find ./ -type f -name "*\.php" -exec grep -Hn "/content/article" {} \;

On Windows: findstr /s /c "/content/article" *.php

@alikon I was just reading the docs https://docs.joomla.org/J4.x:Joomla_Core_APIs to see what needs to be changed, and I saw that there is still singular used for "Contact":
curl -X GET /api/index.php/v1/contact

Is the docs outdated?

If not, then this should be changed, too, for consistency.

@alikon Beside the contacts, that doc shows 3 more where singular is used:

curl -X GET /api/index.php/v1/privacy/request
curl -X GET /api/index.php/v1/privacy/consent
curl -X GET /api/index.php/v1/redirect

if we will get green light on this....i'll do the other changes...i don't want to spend time on endless discussions
as twitter said there will be an RC on tuesday.... ?

@wilsonge Do you want that to be done, what this PR here does plus my findings above, before RC?

If this is accepted, we should do the same for contact (which is using singular at the moment). Also, maybe a stupid question: Why do we need v1/content/articles, not just v1/articles like v1/banners....

If this is accepted, we should do the same for contact (which is using singular at the moment). Also, maybe a stupid question: Why do we need v1/content/articles, not just v1/articles like v1/banners....

@joomdonation If you scroll a little bit up you will find 1 comment by me listing more than not just contact being singular: #34093 (comment) , just below my comment where I already reported that for contact.

Ah Yes @richard67. See it now !

Happy to move to plural. As I said in the issue the only thing is that the “type” property in the API body (contentType property in the view) must be singular (by the json api standard)

@alikon Can this be tested now?

yes only for article vs articles

I'll wait until the others are implemented as well then.

com_contact, com_privacy, com_redirect covered now

I made a start by testing the articles endpoints. The two GET's and POST work as expected. PATCH works but validation is not properly implemented (see #34261). DEL gives me a 500.

good catch ?
api-tests is green..

probably already there ...
anyway i'll check it #34261

api-tests is green..

Do you mean the PATCH test? I checked it and the reason it passes is because the request data of the test includes the title and catid fields. Those must be required for new articles but not for PATCH requests.

yes
outside the scope of this "silly" 1

DEL gives me a 500.

you can delete an article only if it is in trashed status (-2)

for reference see:

• #31581
• #31130

DEL gives me a 500.

you can delete an article only if it is in trashed status (-2)

I very much agree with your reservations in #31130 about having to make 2 requests in order to delete an item. I have the distinct feeling a lot of effort has been put into using as much existing code as possible while implementing the web services. Although I am very much in favor of code reuse, I also think there are important differences between the regular front end services and the web services. This issue is an example of that, as well as the PATCH validation problem I mentioned earlier.

I also think a 500 is not the proper response code for the failure of such an action. Maybe 409 is more appropriate?

Anyway, I executed the PATCH & DELETE combo and then the article is deleted as it should.

I tested the content/articles/contenthistory endpoints and these are my findings:

• GET {{base_path}}/api/index.php/v1/content/articles/contenthistory/{{article_id}} gives me an empty result, even though there are several history items for the targeted article.
• PATCH {{base_path}}/api/index.php/v1/content/articles/contenthistory/keep/{{article_id}} properly toggles keep_forever.
• DELETE {{base_path}}/api/index.php/v1/content/articles/contenthistory/{{article_id}} only deletes the targeted history item if keep_forever is false. When truethe history item is not deleted, but no feed back is given in the response. Worse even, the response is the same in both cases:1`.

Some responses do not comply with the JSON:API specifications. From what I have seen, PATCH and DELETE don't send back proper JSON:API responses. The former responding with just [] and the latter with a literal 1 (see also #34269).

Thanks.

@pjdevries can you open an issue for the content history endpoints. If it's broken it needs fixing and risks getting lost now this is merged.

@pjdevries can you open an issue for the content history endpoints. If it's broken it needs fixing and risks getting lost now this is merged.

See #34361