J4 Issue ?
avatar ReLater
ReLater
26 Oct 2020

Steps to reproduce the issue

I'm confused that in today's nightly the new SCCS from 30873 is compiled differently:

atum/css/template.css:

background-attachment: initial !important;

atum/css/template.min.css:

background-attachment: scroll !important;

Expected result

  • In both *.css: background-attachment: initial !important;

Actual result

  • Different values for background-attachment:
avatar ReLater ReLater - open - 26 Oct 2020
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 26 Oct 2020
Labels Added: ?
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - labeled - 26 Oct 2020
avatar ReLater ReLater - change - 26 Oct 2020
The description was changed
avatar ReLater ReLater - edited - 26 Oct 2020
avatar ReLater ReLater - change - 27 Oct 2020
The description was changed
avatar ReLater ReLater - edited - 27 Oct 2020
avatar agi-code
agi-code - comment - 27 Oct 2020

That is fine: The initial CSS keyword applies the default value of a property to an element. initial is the same as scroll in this case

avatar ReLater
ReLater - comment - 27 Oct 2020

But why not in both CSS files? All rules should be identical for debug purposes.

avatar astridx
astridx - comment - 27 Oct 2020

I do not know why, but: That is made by cssnano in the file joomla-cms4/build/build-modules-js/stylesheets/scss-transform.es6.js
And this runs only for *.min.css - only makes sense for minfied

avatar jwaisner jwaisner - change - 2 Nov 2020
Labels Added: J4 Issue
avatar jwaisner jwaisner - labeled - 2 Nov 2020
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 24 Dec 2020

I would say that this is intended and expected behaviour

avatar ReLater
ReLater - comment - 24 Dec 2020

I would say that this is intended and expected behaviour

I'm leaving this issue with a LOL...

avatar infograf768 infograf768 - change - 24 Jan 2021
Status New Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2021-01-24 16:17:27
Closed_By infograf768
avatar infograf768 infograf768 - close - 24 Jan 2021
avatar infograf768
infograf768 - comment - 24 Jan 2021

I guess we can close this.

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment