User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Take it or leave it - Up to you.
Expected/Actual is "often subject of confusion".
New headings make it more clearer-er.
// @richard67
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Category | ⇒ | Repository |
I'd like to know @brianteeman 's opinion.
Dont worry I'm sure he will give it. haha
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2020-06-21 11:49:41 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | PhilETaylor | |
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Why closing?
Status | Closed | ⇒ | New |
Closed_Date | 2020-06-21 11:49:41 | ⇒ | |
Closed_By | PhilETaylor | ⇒ |
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Changed as proposed:
### Actual result BEFORE applying this Pull Request
### Expected result AFTER applying this Pull Request
I have tested this item
Makes sense to me and is an improvement in my opinion. Meaning of actual and expected result always was subject of confusion at least for new contributors.
I have tested this item
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Ready to Commit |
RTC
Status | Ready to Commit | ⇒ | Fixed in Code Base |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2020-06-21 14:46:39 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | wilsonge | |
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Seems clearer to me. Thanks!
I agree 100% with the motivation and the goal of this PR, but maybe the texts can be optimized?
I'd like to know @brianteeman 's opinion.
Maybe just drop the "Expected" so we just have "Result BEFORE applying this PR" and "Result AFTER applying this PR"?
Or maybe stay with "Actual" and "Expected" so we have "Actual result BEFORE applying this PR" and "Expected result AFTER applying this PR"?
And maybe in general use "Pull Request" instead of "PR"?