User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
The linked page is very out of date. It doesnt represent joomla sponsors or joomla partners.
My 2c is that linking to them doesnt belong in the file.
But if its decided that it should be there then it should at least be accurate and fixes a typo
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Category | ⇒ | Repository |
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Except it should also include ncludw partners who are not on that page
We could double the link with something like this:
Special thanks to our Sponsors (linked to sponsors) and Partners (linked to Partners)
What do you think?
My 2c is that those links have no place in the readme
Sponsors can be found at https://www.joomla.org/about-joomla/partners.html
I would add both to the readme without them it would be much harder for us, also it's a promotion for other to join this list and support us too.
My 2c is that those links have no place in the readme
That would work too
Sponsors can be found at https://www.joomla.org/about-joomla/partners.html
I would add both to the readme without them it would be much harder for us, also it's a promotion for other to join this list and support us too.
Harald these are Partners and not Sponsors :)
I have tested this item
I have tested this item
I have tested this item
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Ready to Commit |
RTC
Status | Ready to Commit | ⇒ | Fixed in Code Base |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2019-07-22 21:03:44 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | HLeithner | |
Labels |
Added:
?
|
thx
Thanks
Imo we should link to https://www.joomla.org/current-sponsors.html which is the updated page