? No Code Attached Yet J3 Issue ?
avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder
6 Feb 2019

To help assist users migrate from J3 to J4, I think it might be wise to automate things a little from the template side of things.

For example, in the Protostar template, we use position-7 for the right hand side, and sidebar-right for Cassiopeia.

So it would be nice to have a script in place that automatically changes the positions of modules to their relatively position in J4, assuming Isis it the default template being used.

avatar C-Lodder C-Lodder - open - 6 Feb 2019
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 6 Feb 2019
Labels Added: ? ?
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - labeled - 6 Feb 2019
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - labeled - 6 Feb 2019
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 6 Feb 2019

Isis is admin and Cassiopeia is front end

avatar Fedik
Fedik - comment - 6 Feb 2019

the idea not bad,

I see only one potential issue, when Cassiopeia is default template, but user also have a custom template with the same position name as in Cassiopeia, and this custom template are assigned to specific menu.

avatar C-Lodder C-Lodder - change - 6 Feb 2019
The description was changed
avatar C-Lodder C-Lodder - edited - 6 Feb 2019
avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder - comment - 6 Feb 2019

@brianteeman I meant Protostar

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 6 Feb 2019

@C-Lodder ahah

Its a nice idea to have a "mapping table" that will map the protostar positions to the cassiopeia positions

I would only run it if the user is actively using the protostar template though. Most 3pd templates use their own position names but there may be one or two positions that are named the same. We wouldnt want to do a partial "migration"

avatar Bakual
Bakual - comment - 6 Feb 2019

You could have a button in the Cassiopeia Template to trigger that migration, but I'm not sure if it's really that useful or if it is more confusing for all those who didn't use Protostar.

avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder - comment - 6 Feb 2019

Of course. It would have to be a full migration, based on people havving Protostar set as their only template.

Not fussed about how the migrations takes place, be it on the actual update itself or a button in the template settings, but either way, it will save the need to assign all modules again

avatar franz-wohlkoenig franz-wohlkoenig - change - 3 Mar 2019
Status New Discussion
avatar franz-wohlkoenig franz-wohlkoenig - change - 28 Mar 2019
Category com_modules
avatar franz-wohlkoenig franz-wohlkoenig - change - 4 Apr 2019
Labels Added: J3 Issue
avatar franz-wohlkoenig franz-wohlkoenig - labeled - 4 Apr 2019
avatar jwaisner jwaisner - change - 24 Mar 2020
Status Discussion Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2020-03-24 15:17:27
Closed_By jwaisner
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 24 Mar 2020
Status Closed Discussion
Labels Removed: ?
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 24 Mar 2020
Status Discussion Closed
Closed_By jwaisner joomla-cms-bot
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - close - 24 Mar 2020
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - unlabeled - 24 Mar 2020
avatar joomla-cms-bot
joomla-cms-bot - comment - 24 Mar 2020

Set to "closed" on behalf of @jwaisner by The JTracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/23778

avatar jwaisner
jwaisner - comment - 24 Mar 2020

This RFC has not been updated in almost a year. Closing this out. If there is a feature that is requested for J4 please open a feature request.


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/23778.

avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 24 Mar 2020
Labels Added: ?
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - labeled - 24 Mar 2020
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 24 Mar 2020

This should not be closed. Just think a little PLEASE before closing something

avatar brianteeman brianteeman - change - 24 Mar 2020
Status Closed New
Closed_Date 2020-03-24 15:17:27
Closed_By joomla-cms-bot
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - reopen - 24 Mar 2020
avatar jwaisner jwaisner - change - 24 Mar 2020
Status New Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2020-03-24 16:38:31
Closed_By jwaisner
avatar jwaisner jwaisner - close - 24 Mar 2020
avatar jwaisner
jwaisner - comment - 24 Mar 2020

I stand by my closing of this issue. If it is a feature request, then an item needs opened as such.

avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder - comment - 24 Mar 2020

@jwaisner I opened this as an [RFC], meaning Request For Comment. It can be considered a feature request or something that should simply be done in core.

I don't need to use a premade template for feature requests, so please stop closing this.

avatar brianteeman brianteeman - change - 24 Mar 2020
Status Closed New
Closed_Date 2020-03-24 16:38:31
Closed_By jwaisner
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - reopen - 24 Mar 2020
avatar wilsonge
wilsonge - comment - 24 Mar 2020

The problem with this is - it's very hard to detect that protostar is the only used template. Because you can set template overrides in menu items etc. I think practically the use case is rare and maybe we could just say that this use case is a higher priority....

avatar Quy Quy - change - 4 Jun 2021
Labels Added: ?
avatar Quy Quy - labeled - 4 Jun 2021
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 31 Jan 2022

I guess this can be closed now that j4 is released?

avatar wilsonge wilsonge - change - 1 Feb 2022
Status New Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2022-02-01 01:15:45
Closed_By wilsonge
Labels Added: ? No Code Attached Yet ?
Removed: ? ? ?
avatar wilsonge wilsonge - close - 1 Feb 2022

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment