User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Pull Request for Issue #23604 (comment)
After that discussion and merge of #23604 @HLeithner and I thought that we may have the wrong code since 1.5 (see discussion above) concerning the way to get an editor field in Custom modules or similar using < customContent />
in their manifest.
This patch also simplifies the custom type module edit in frontend as we now check the xml, thus normalizing the code vs backend.
Install mod_customadv.zip
Create or edit a custom module and the module above in back-end and frontend to confirm the editor field displays.
Pinging also @johanjanssens (see discussion) as the original code comes from 1.5 and, before merging this, it would be important to know if there was a reason for it or if it was just a typo that made gently its way until now...
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Category | ⇒ | Administration com_modules Front End com_config |
Title |
|
Labels |
Added:
?
|
I have tested this item
I have tested this item
I have tested this item
I have tested this item
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Ready to Commit |
RTC
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Status | Ready to Commit | ⇒ | Fixed in Code Base |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2019-02-25 17:10:49 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | HLeithner |
thx
@HLeithner
done