I have to agree with you - if i compare the two then for me at least the version compare in j3 is much easier to use

Sounds fair enough.

Would you mind submitting a PR?
This is the vendor package being used: https://github.com/kpdecker/jsdiff

if i remember correctly the reason for the change was because of the change in library?

Can't remember. Easily fixable though

@CiverBlack can you take couple screenshots in j3 so we can visualise the changes you are referring here?

By the way there is no way to go back to the previous script as there are quite some maintainability problems with that (no uncompressed source code, no GitHub repo, the script is simply dead)

@dgt41 we don't need to go back to the old script.

Don't worry, I'll add this to my to-do list and get a PR submitted at some point

@C-Lodder maybe we can work on this at the sprint next weekend

@dgt41 they are like comparing apples and carrots

sounds good to me Brian

@dgt41 Here are the screenshots you wanted.

There are to many information displayed to get them all on my screen. So hear is a list of the entries which are displayed when show all is selected.

Field, Id, Title, Alias, Intro Text, Full text, Status, Category, Created Date, Created By, Created by Alias, Modified Date, Modified By, Start Publishing, Finish Publishing, Image Options, URL Options, Options, Ordering, Meta Keywords, Meta Description, Access, Hits, Metadata, Robots, Featured, Language, External Reference

I also just realized that it would help to be able to adjust the width of the 3 Rows.

HTML-Tags included and only the changed values:

HTML-Tags not included and with all values:

@CiverBlack what is the output if you click on the Changed Values button?

@dgt41 you get only these columns where there is a change between the two versions.

It's basically just adding a button to hide/show the HTML tags within the changes.

I am proposing to reintroduce the "show/hide-HTML"-Button and the "All/Changed Values"-Button.

@C-Lodder so that button exists?
Also didn't we discussed this and we decided to only show the things that actually have some changes or my memory fails me? If that was the case, honestly I'm against presenting the complete data, only the affected areas is the right approach from all point of views. As is this is very close to what GitHub has (or not?)

If it were down to me, I'd leave it as it is, cause it displays all changes, be it HTML or not.

But then again, not everybody works with a HTML editor , so may get very confused as what what the HTML tags are being displayed for, or what they even are.

This should be closed @richard67

Closing for reasons stated above.