? Pending

User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman
24 Apr 2017

Correct some typos
Correct some paths
Remove chosen from the list
Add dragula to the list

avatar brianteeman brianteeman - open - 24 Apr 2017
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - change - 24 Apr 2017
Status New Pending
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 24 Apr 2017
Category Repository
avatar wilsonge wilsonge - close - 24 Apr 2017
avatar wilsonge wilsonge - merge - 24 Apr 2017
avatar wilsonge wilsonge - change - 24 Apr 2017
Status Pending Fixed in Code Base
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2017-04-24 11:03:21
Closed_By wilsonge
Labels Added: ?
avatar wilsonge
wilsonge - comment - 24 Apr 2017

Thanks!

avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder - comment - 24 Apr 2017

Incomplete but ok

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 24 Apr 2017

what was incomplete? what did I miss

Note if you are referring to the list of extensions that are installed then I was thinking that it was best not to list them in the readme anyway as it will be hard to keep uptodate

avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder - comment - 24 Apr 2017

Some are missing still. If you think it would be best to remove them from the readme, I'm fine with that. If you want to submit a PR, go for it, else I can do so :)

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 24 Apr 2017

I took the list from /dev/assets/packages.json

avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder - comment - 24 Apr 2017

This file gets automatically updated when you run grunt, so you're probably on a older version. Have a look in root/media/vendor or grunt_settings.yaml for a list of all packages

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 24 Apr 2017

packages.json is certainly out of date compared to grunt_settings.yaml

which suggest to me that this line in the readme is incorrect

  • grunt shell:update.................will update all the npm packages to the version defined in /dev/assets/package.json

Even more reason not to include the list of extensions in the readme but it would be good to replace it with the definitive place to find the list which right now I am not sure what that is

avatar dgt41
dgt41 - comment - 24 Apr 2017

since we're still haven't rich the stability level, I'll say let this file as is and we'll revisit it once all the javascript tasks are completed.
Eg. #14594 adds two more scripts to the list and is not the last PR from the task list...

avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder - comment - 24 Apr 2017

No, it's not incorrect. The way it works is:

  1. Run grunt
  2. This will read all the packages from the grunt_settings.yaml
  3. This willl then dynamically create a package.json

The reason why there's an old package.json there is cause it must have been committed ages ago. It the only file in the dev/assets directory on the Github repo. Not sure how Github plays with empty directories to be honest.

avatar zero-24
zero-24 - comment - 24 Apr 2017

Not sure how Github plays with empty directories to be honest.

It is going to be removed ;) This is the reason for the index.html files in some folders that are expected to be empty

avatar dgt41
dgt41 - comment - 24 Apr 2017

It is going to be removed

If I remember well it will be recreated by the script, so np

avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder - comment - 24 Apr 2017

cool, so just remove the package.json and add an index.html

avatar zero-24
zero-24 - comment - 24 Apr 2017

cool, so just remove the package.json and add an index.html

Sounds like a plan ?

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment