? Pending

User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:

avatar zero-24
zero-24
4 Sep 2016

Pull Request for Issue found in the german forum https://forum.joomla.de/index.php/Thread/2505-Abstand-zwischen-task-buttons

Summary of Changes

This restores the seperator / spacer functionality this is broken since arround 2014

Testing Instructions

image

Documentation Changes Required

None

avatar zero-24 zero-24 - open - 4 Sep 2016
avatar zero-24 zero-24 - change - 4 Sep 2016
Status New Pending
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 4 Sep 2016
Category Layout
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 4 Sep 2016
Labels Added: ?
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 4 Sep 2016

we would expect a space of 50px between the edit and the publish button

Why would we expect that?

avatar brianteeman brianteeman - test_item - 4 Sep 2016 - Tested unsuccessfully
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 4 Sep 2016

I have tested this item ? unsuccessfully on deca964

Applied the patch - no change


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/11927.

avatar brianteeman brianteeman - alter_testresult - 4 Sep 2016 - brianteeman: Not tested
avatar zero-24
zero-24 - comment - 4 Sep 2016

Why would we expect that?

As we add the code that at there is a spacer with 50px ;) Add this line JToolBarHelper::spacer('50px');

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 4 Sep 2016

i think i misunderstand something

On 4 September 2016 at 18:51, Brian Teeman brian@teeman.net wrote:

we would expect a space of 50px between the edit and the publish button

Why would we expect that?

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 4 Sep 2016

It was removed here #1686 by @rdeutz

avatar zero-24
zero-24 - comment - 4 Sep 2016

Correct. But i don't see a reason that this is removed. But if it should be still removed than we should deprecte that and not pointing it to a clear layout that makes no sense.

At least ist works for me with that patch so way not restore that was removed 2014?

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 4 Sep 2016

Your patch worked for me as well. But I'm sure that @rdeutz must have had a
good reason - even if we cant guess it

On 4 September 2016 at 19:53, zero-24 notifications@github.com wrote:

Correct. But i don't see a reason that this is removed. But if it should
be still removed than we should deprecte that and not pointing it to a
clear layout that makes no sense.

At least ist works for me with that patch so way not restore that was
removed 2014?


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#11927 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPH8c6wAJtoCewXpDL4ZXsOPAFaZK_Nks5qmxOXgaJpZM4J0li8
.

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

avatar dgt41
dgt41 - comment - 4 Sep 2016

Another reason might be: styling should be done (preferably) using classes not inline

avatar bertmert
bertmert - comment - 4 Sep 2016

@zero-24
Thanks for this PR.

Confusing and senseless at the moment:
JToolBarHelper::spacer()

calls class

JToolbarButtonSeparator on its way through Joomla that uses

$layout = new JLayoutFile('joomla.toolbar.separator');

that is empty.

I don't know if it's better to add a new method JToolBarHelper::separator() or a new JLayout spacer.php or something. At the moment it's a completely confusing mixture of names and not obvious which JLayout one can use for overrides.

And no, I wouldn't remove Spacer/Separator or deprecate it.

avatar zero-24
zero-24 - comment - 4 Sep 2016

@dgt41 I'm no CSS expert do we have a way to dynamic style via CSS from PHP? In a goog and clean way ;)

Thanks @bertmert what do you suggest maybe we can proxy both methods to one layout or should they do different things?

avatar dgt41
dgt41 - comment - 4 Sep 2016

None that I know. But to be fair here joomla is using inline css all over the place so one more won't be the end of the world. Although modern design dictates that styling should be done with classes. So no real objection, just a note ?

avatar ThomasFinnern
ThomasFinnern - comment - 5 Sep 2016

"JToolBarHelper::spacer" is not used inside of standard joomla code. On the other side
"JToolbarHelper::divider()" is used. Both are connected as both are actual 3.6.2 not inserting space between toolbar buttons.
Fortunatelly this patch fixes both. I added the lines manually and found both working
Thanks for the fix

avatar rdeutz
rdeutz - comment - 5 Sep 2016

I removed it because you can't use it this way, it opens and close a "btn-group" and that doesn't makes sense. There must be something within the group. Further more it isn't a separator then.

avatar zero-24
zero-24 - comment - 5 Sep 2016

So we should close here and mark that methods as deprected?

avatar rdeutz
rdeutz - comment - 5 Sep 2016

close yes, but there might be a css framework that supports a thing like separator it the future, who knows ;-)

avatar zero-24
zero-24 - comment - 5 Sep 2016

Closing as requested

avatar zero-24 zero-24 - change - 5 Sep 2016
Status Pending Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2016-09-05 19:18:49
Closed_By zero-24
avatar zero-24 zero-24 - close - 5 Sep 2016
avatar ThomasFinnern
ThomasFinnern - comment - 5 Sep 2016

Hey, for five minutes "JToolBarHelper::spacer" and "JToolbarHelper::divider()" were working in the future.

JToolbarHelper::divider() is mentioned in the component development
https://docs.joomla.org/J3.x:Developing_an_MVC_Component/Adding_ACL
It is used in 125 files of joomla. Shouldn't we give it a function ?

avatar rdeutz
rdeutz - comment - 5 Sep 2016

that comes from the 2.5 days, but since we are using bootstrap there is not markup for this

avatar zero-24
zero-24 - comment - 5 Sep 2016

But what is the problem to use a dive with xxx pixels? What kind of markup do we need?

avatar rdeutz
rdeutz - comment - 5 Sep 2016

no problem, what I am saying is:

  • There isn't a equivalent in bootstrap for what we had in 2.5 out of the box
  • The markup I removed hasn't makes sense
<span class="spacer">|</span>

not sure what we need to add to make it accessible, that would need an expert on this area

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment