User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Pull Request for Issue #9547.
com_joomlaupdate and com_installer, and deprecate the com_joomlaupdate component.com_installer at this time to validate direction.com_joomlaupdate has been merged into com_installer so that all installations and upgrades are processed using the forked installer and monitor. The same Akeeba restore code is still used, with a second Joomla! forked installer for non-core packages.install and update controller events that performed installation were supplanted with logic to direct the procedure to a new installer controller.installer controller and model were added that receive requests for single or batch installation.com_joomlaupdate monitor and standalone installer logic was ported into the new installer operation.InstallerModelInstall -> initialize operation that separates the previous unpacking and installation operations. The net result of this method is the set the package state value for the model and return true on success. This should be further compressed into the core JInstaller class.extension processing currently requires the Joomla! kernal / library.com_joomlaupdate features that deal with instructions and notification have not been ported. This could best be refactored into a standard for all packages to share, allowing updates and upgrade notices for all packages.JUpdate class operations into the JInstaller class.JInstaller class to eliminate dependency on the com_installer controller.JInstaller class dependencies need to be isolated & minized so that it can be included for standalone operations.| Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
| Labels |
Added:
?
?
|
||
| Labels | |||
| Category | ⇒ | Installation Language & Strings |
@brianteeman I've not used the com_patchtester. Is there a specific change required to work with that component?
no its a limitation of that component not your code
On 14 April 2016 at 16:49, Dakuzen notifications@github.com wrote:
@brianteeman https://github.com/brianteeman I've not used the
com_patchtester. Is there a specific change required to work with that
component?—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9793 (comment)
Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/
I think this is a good idea!
I use Watchfully though but it nice to have things on one place.
| Status | Pending | ⇒ | Needs Review |
| Labels | |||
Setting to Needs Review before any more time is spent on this to see if this is a route that we want to go down or not.
Thank you for your suggestion but the PLT has decided that this is not something that we will include in the core of Joomla! at the moment after balancing the pros and cons.
| Status | Needs Review | ⇒ | Closed |
| Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2016-05-07 16:03:09 |
| Closed_By | ⇒ | Kubik-Rubik |
Well there could be technical pros and cons i think.
But i think like a user and cant see any Cons.
Stuf on one place is just easier and i like easy.
If i update in jooma and extensions i am always a bit confused about the 2 different places and where to find the extensions update location (that difficult to find).
On my mac i also have 1 place for updates. Not one for my OS an one for my apps.
Out of curiosity @Kubik-Rubik, what are the "pros and cons" you levied in this decision?
I'm going to walk away from this but I will say it seems, as with mbabker's original rejection of this idea, that this is being dismissed for no reason other than an entrenchment with the recent separation agenda.
Note to testers this can not be tested using com_patchtester
This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/9793.