?
Referenced as Pull Request for: # 9056 # 9057 # 9059 # 9060
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman
3 Feb 2016

Steps to reproduce the issue

Log out and clear all cookies
Log back in and go to plugin manager. You will see all the plugins sorted by Type Ascending as shown by the arrow not Type Descending as shown by the dropdown select
screen shot 2016-02-03 at 02 26 21

Scroll to the bottom and click 2 on the pagination
screen shot 2016-02-03 at 02 27 30
Now you will see all the plugins sorted by Type Descending as shown by the arrow AND by the dropdown select

Not tested but I suspect ALL manager views have the same/similar bug where the default value in the dropdown doesnt match the default value in the column headers which is what (i think) is causing the problem - @pe7er I think this was a PR you did?

avatar brianteeman brianteeman - open - 3 Feb 2016
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 3 Feb 2016

Full List

Plugins

Switches from Type Ascending to Type Descending

Modules

Switches from Position Ascending to Ordering Ascending

Featured

Switches from ID Descending to Title Ascending

Contacts

Switches from Title Ascending to ID Descending

Newsfeeds

Switches from Title Ascending to ID Descending

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 3 Feb 2016

We have PR for
Plugins #9060
Modules #9059
Contacts #9057
Newsfeeds #9056

Thanks @bertmert can you do one for featured as well ?


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/9054.

avatar bertmert
bertmert - comment - 3 Feb 2016

See PRs please and test.

For featured we need a decision first.

Featured uses function populateState of model ContentModelArticles. There default ordering is hard coded (I don't know why)
parent::populateState('a.id', 'desc');

Shall Featured from now on be ordered also by id descending or by title ascending?

In both cases we have to change featured model.or both models.

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 3 Feb 2016

For featured I would personally go for ordering but I dont really care as long as both settings are the same and we dont get this pagination bug

avatar bertmert
bertmert - comment - 3 Feb 2016

OK, I will see how to manage it.

I just made some quick tests with other PRs. I hope they work.

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 3 Feb 2016

Already tested them - theyre great

avatar bertmert
bertmert - comment - 3 Feb 2016

See PR for Featured: #9061

I tried to use ordering ascending as default but another issue occured. No ordering buttons without page reload.
So, it's title ascending as before.

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 3 Feb 2016

Closing as we have PRs - thanks!!!


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/9054.

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 3 Feb 2016

@brianteeman You forgot to close this? ;-)

avatar brianteeman brianteeman - change - 3 Feb 2016
Status New Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2016-02-03 13:39:17
Closed_By brianteeman
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - close - 3 Feb 2016
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - close - 3 Feb 2016
avatar pe7er
pe7er - comment - 6 Feb 2016

@brianteeman I was a week off-the-grid due to the flu.
Yeah, it might have been caused by my PRs. Sorry...

@bertmert Thanks for your PRs!

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 6 Feb 2016

Hope you are better now -- you must have caught something at Fosdem. See
you next weekend

On 6 February 2016 at 13:25, Peter Martin notifications@github.com wrote:

@brianteeman https://github.com/brianteeman I was a week off-the-grid
due to the flu.
Yeah, it might have been caused by my PRs. Sorry...

@bertmert https://github.com/bertmert Thanks for your PRs!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9054 (comment).

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment