?
avatar gphood
gphood
3 Jun 2015

Steps to reproduce the issue

Log into Administrator
Trash a standard article.
Filter the article view to see all trashed articles.
See the option buttons under Status, one of which is Trash
Click on the Trash button.
Remove the Trashed filter
View the remaining Published articles

Expected result

When the article view filter is set for Trashed articles, the Trash button should completely delete the article from Joomla and that should be reflected in the Tooltip for that button.
After the final Trash, that article should no longer appear in the Article Manager.

Actual result

Hovering over the Trash button generates a Tooltip saying 'Publish Item'
Clicking on the Trash button republishes the article instead of completely removing it from the system.

System information (as much as possible)

Linux cloud hosting running PHP 5.512 and MySQL 5.6.21 and Apache
Joomla! 3.4.1 Stable

Additional comments

avatar gphood gphood - open - 3 Jun 2015
avatar gphood gphood - change - 3 Jun 2015
Build 3.4.1 Stabl staging
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 3 Jun 2015
Labels Added: ?
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 3 Jun 2015

As the tooltip indicates the button there is used to toggle the state of the article from trashed to published.

To empty the trsh you need to select the items and click on the empty trash button on the toolbar

avatar gphood
gphood - comment - 3 Jun 2015

Hi Brian

Thanks for the quick feedback. Not sure how I missed the additional buttons above the filter buttons - I've actually used it before so I've no excuse. I was confused by the button still having the Trash icon on it, even though it publishes. I think I'd thought it was a reworked feature. Should it have a different icon on it?

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 3 Jun 2015

Thats a valid point.
Unfortunately though that button has two purposes. One to visually display the current status (remember you can display all articles in a single view) and to perform an action (republish). So I am really not sure what it could be changed to as it will always be a poor representation for one of the functions. Not ideal but I believe the current way is the best of a bad job

avatar gphood
gphood - comment - 3 Jun 2015

Righto - understood. Appreciate your time.

avatar gphood gphood - change - 3 Jun 2015
Status New Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2015-06-03 08:17:25
Closed_By gphood
Build master staging
avatar gphood gphood - close - 3 Jun 2015

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment