User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Following the roadmap for Joomla 3.5:
Remove additional components and all associated pieces. ([...] com_banners).[...]
http://developer.joomla.org/cms/roadmap.html
This will remove com_banners from the core new installs.
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Category | ⇒ | Administration Components |
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
@dgt41 Can you send it against my repo/PR/branch? https://github.com/zero-24/banners/tree/initial
@zero-24 Also https://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/search?o=desc&q=banners&s=created&type=Issues&utf8=✓
I see a lot of open PRs. Will be nice to inform those people to push their code to the new repo
@dgt41 Thanks see: joomla-extensions/banners#1 (comment)
Closing as the PLT decides to not decuple any more extension for now see: http://developer.joomla.org/news/616-meeting-notes-from-jab-plt-summit-2015.html
The PLT went on to discuss the removal of core supported extensions. There are 2 existing PR’s for component removal in 3.5 - banners and messages. Issues were raised about how marketing and release teams would deal with having to release half a dozen extensions and the CMS in a worse case scenario as there are little plans in place. It was also raised that there were also little provision in place for setting up distributions and a new method of sample data. It was therefore agreed that we will remove com_messages but leave com_banners in the CMS while the PLT deals with the issues mentioned.
I will open a PR to backport the fixes from the new Repo to the CMS See: #7337
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2015-07-03 23:30:04 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | zero-24 |
That doesn't mean we're not going to decouple any more core extensions. It just means that we're pausing while we work out the logistical issues that have come to light after weblinks was decoupled.
Yes, backporting is good. Just don't give up on decoupling. :-)
hmm we have also issues with decoupling messages (#6352 (comment)). So there we also need a decision, as it break in the current state B/C this needs to wait for 4.0 or we have a other solution ;).
My small 2c is that although I understand the logistic issues that brought the PLT to such decision, it is really unfortunate we don't proceed with decoupling extensions from the core as planned.
@zero-24 shall I close #6986 and re do it in the new repo?