User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
see: #5597
-Go to article list view and check the date column.
-Is it really meaningful?
-Refer screenshot please and read the text written over the screenshot!
Labels |
Added:
?
|
Category | ⇒ | Language & Strings UI/UX |
Rel_Number | ⇒ | 5597 | |
Relation Type | ⇒ | Pull Request for |
if necessary, can't we use:
COM_CONTENT_FIELD_CREATED_LABEL="Created Date"
This would avoid adding a new string.
done @infograf768
Personally I dont think this change is correct. I can see why you are
making the change but sometimes we have to compromise for the sake of a
clean UI. Making this into two words (in english) breaks the flow of the
UI for minimal advantage. If it really must be changed (I don't think it
does) then you could perhaps do it in the tooltip
On 3 Jan 2015 11:11, "Aasim Ali" notifications@github.com wrote:
You're welcome @zero-24 https://github.com/zero-24 and Thank you for
pull request.Have an awesome day.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5598 (comment).
Also please check in Hathor. Making this change makes this column heading go to two rows which is not consistent with the rest of the UI
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Closed |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2015-01-11 00:41:46 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | zero-24 |
closing. as per comment by @brianteeman
Closed_Date | 2015-01-11 00:41:46 | ⇒ | 2015-01-11 00:41:47 |
@brianteeman Is
Creation Date
ok?