So is this a replacement for #5569 ?? Of so please close that PR

@brianteeman No, it is not a replacement: it is an alternative...

You are modifying external libraries such as FoF - please dont. they are
maintained seperatley

On 2 January 2015 at 01:50, Sergio Manzi notifications@github.com wrote:

@brianteeman https://github.com/brianteeman No, it is not a
replacement: it is an alternative...

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5586 (comment).

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

Since you are modifying external libraries, it is a no brainer. Closing!

Please do not create multiple PRs for the same issue. It makes it much harder to follow the conversion. Reminding you, many developers have already given you advice, start small. You are only wasting your time and theirs. Thanks!

@brianteeman & @Hutchy68 Sorry, but I was under the impression that FoF is not an external library anymore (the external one being F0F)... Am I wrong?

@mbabker Thanks for all the suggestions/advices. Most of them have been incorporated in a commit to #5569.

For the reasons you very well know this PR is a dead horse, so if in the future you'll have more advices for me, please use #5569

In it, at least for the moment, I'm not going to change the calls to JPath::ux_clean() to JPath::clean(..., '/') as this will probably be really wasted time. I will do in the unlikely event that the PR is for unforeseeable reasons accepted.

Your help is really appreciated: you're a master and a gentleman.

FOF is 3rd party and is maintained at www.github.com/akeeba/fof

@wilsonge My bad: I thought that after the controversy about the change in licensing terms @nikosdion had "donated" FOF to the Joomla project and abandoned its development (F0F being his new incarnation used in his products).