@roland-d Shouldn't they be added to README.md, too? https://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/blob/6.3-dev/README.md?plain=1#L18-L19

Beat me to it

@TLWebdesign You approve this PR despite of my comment which clearly shows that the PR is not complete?

Uhm i think i only approved the changes to the file he changed. It indeed needs the second file altered too. Lesson learned thanks 😅

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 74d181a

@roland-d @TLWebdesign In the other branches we use in both files also the GitHub name after the real name, see e.g. here for 6.2-dev:

• https://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/blob/6.2-dev/README.md
• https://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/blob/6.2-dev/README.txt

Viviana Menzel @drmenzelit
Martin Kopp @MacJoom

And in the .md we use a 2nd level dotted list.

I think it would be good to do it the same way here so we have it the same way on all branches.

You could use the 6.2-dev files as examples.

But that's just a suggestion my me. At the end it is your decision how you like it.

We want to be consistent so i'd say we do it the same. Thanks for pointing that out.

I already made the names a 2nd level dotted list in the md file. The usernames are now added as well.

I already made the names a 2nd level dotted list in the md file. The usernames are now added as well.

@roland-d Thanks. But in 6.2-dev they have the GitHub names in both files .md and .txt. You currently have them only in the .md.

Refresh please

To me they look identical now to the 6.2 files. with github names in both and 2nd level indentations.

To me they look identical now to the 6.2 files. with github names in both and 2nd level indentations.

Yes, now it looks good. Maybe I was just too fast or too impatient.

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 3a001af

testing it correctly this time

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 3a001af

RTC

Thanks @roland for this PR and @richard67 and @brianteeman for testing.