PR-5.4-dev Pending

User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:

avatar laoneo
laoneo
11 Jun 2026
  • I read the Generative AI policy and my contribution is either not created with the help of AI or is compatible with the policy and GNU/GPL 2 or later.

Summary of Changes

Porting back some changes from the 6.2 branch and additionally #47914. Related pr's are:

Testing Instructions

Code review.

Link to documentations

Please select:

  • Documentation link for guide.joomla.org:

  • No documentation changes for guide.joomla.org needed

  • Pull Request link for manual.joomla.org:

  • No documentation changes for manual.joomla.org needed

avatar laoneo laoneo - open - 11 Jun 2026
avatar laoneo laoneo - change - 11 Jun 2026
Status New Pending
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 11 Jun 2026
Category Repository
avatar laoneo laoneo - change - 11 Jun 2026
The description was changed
avatar laoneo laoneo - edited - 11 Jun 2026
avatar laoneo laoneo - change - 11 Jun 2026
The description was changed
avatar laoneo laoneo - edited - 11 Jun 2026
avatar Hackwar
Hackwar - comment - 11 Jun 2026

Can we please add a message in the respective PR that we updated the codestyle and/or baseline in each case? Users should be informed that their code has been changed.

avatar Hackwar
Hackwar - comment - 11 Jun 2026

And since we are dropping phpcs with this PR from the CI, can we remove it entirely? See the changes from #45932

avatar laoneo laoneo - change - 11 Jun 2026
Labels Added: PR-5.4-dev
avatar laoneo
laoneo - comment - 11 Jun 2026

Can we please add a message in the respective PR that we updated the codestyle and/or baseline in each case? Users should be informed that their code has been changed.

I think this is not needed as there is a new commit from the bot where they get notified.

And since we are dropping phpcs with this PR from the CI, can we remove it entirely? See the changes from #45932

This should then be done in 7.0 or 6.2 if really needed. But definitely not in 5.4.

avatar Hackwar
Hackwar - comment - 11 Jun 2026

I've gotten close to a hundred mails from Github in the 11 days of this month so far and I generally skip over the commit messages in a PR. I would not notice the commit from a bot between all those other messages and notices. I strongly suggest adding a comment that we did this over the head of the developer.

avatar laoneo
laoneo - comment - 11 Jun 2026

And what would you do differently when you get a mail with the extra comment beside the commit mail?

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 11 Jun 2026

I'm with @Hackwar on this. At least on my own PR I would want to know. How else will I learn for next time

avatar laoneo
laoneo - comment - 11 Jun 2026

I guess you missed the intention for this. This is not something the pr developer has actually to care about and learn. It is something we as a project require and enforce with this pr. As a pr author you should not care about code style and just write your improvement. This is not something you have to learn. This pr is that you can forget it and focus on your work.

avatar laoneo
laoneo - comment - 11 Jun 2026

I guess you missed the intention for this. This is not something the pr developer has actually to care about and learn. It is something we as a project require and enforce with this pr. As a pr author you should not care about code style and just write your improvement. This is not something you have to learn. This pr is made that you can forget about code style and focus on your work.

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 11 Jun 2026

I would rather learn to do it right then have it fixed silently. You don't learn to spell by having your work in one place corrected silently. Not everywhere I write will have the spell checker enabled.

avatar laoneo
laoneo - comment - 11 Jun 2026

I leave it like this, if the project wants it, then take it as is, otherwise close the pr.

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment