[Main category]
|- [sub category 1] => In "Option" tab, set Layout = "Use Global"
Or
[Main category]
|- [sub category 1] => In "Option" tab, set Layout = "Blog"
[Menu 1]
- Main tab settings => Menu Item Type = "Category blog", chosen category is [Main category], Parent Item = "No parent"
- Category tab settings => Subcategory Levels = "Use Global (1)" or any other value except "None"; Empty Categories = "Show"
5.4
Sub category [sub category 1] should be displayed in a blog type layout
Sub category [sub category 1] is displayed in a list type layout regardless of the layout chosen in the category options and/or in System > Global configuration > Articles | Category tab => "Choose a Layout"
No response
We tried to create overrides of files in /templates/cassiopeia/html/com_content/category/ with no suucess. It seems that "category_layout" var can't be used.
| Labels |
Added:
No Code Attached Yet
bug
|
||
Do you already have a menu item that points to sub category 1
Have you switched to the Cassiopeia template to rule out an error with your template
We tried to create overrides of files in /templates/cassiopeia/html/com_content/category/ with no suucess. It seems that "category_layout" var can't be used.
Did you want to make an aternative layout?
Do you already have a menu item that points to sub category 1 Have you switched to the Cassiopeia template to rule out an error with your template
As described, I reproduce this with a fresh new Joomla 5.4.3 installation with no other template than Cassiopeia.
We tried to create overrides of files in /templates/cassiopeia/html/com_content/category/ with no suucess. It seems that "category_layout" var can't be used.
Did you want to make an aternative layout?
Not at this time. Juste noticed this with the standard Cassiopeia template.
Hi, I’ve reproduced this issue on Joomla 5.4.x using the Cassiopeia template.
Subcategories in "Category Blog" view are always rendered using list layout, even when "Blog" layout is selected globally or in category options.
I’d like to work on fixing this issue. Could you please confirm if this is expected behavior or if a fix would be welcome?
Thanks!
I can't reproduce.