No Code Attached Yet
avatar Ruud68
Ruud68
21 Aug 2025

Steps to reproduce the issue

set PHP version to e.g. 8.2 (not 8.3)
on 5.4.0-beta1 start upgrade to 6.0.0-beta1

Expected result

PHP version check should be incorrect

Actual result

PHP version check states it is correct ( > 8.1)

when visiting the upgrade site > "Sorry, your PHP version is not supported. Your host needs to use PHP version 8.3.0 or newer to run this version of Joomla."

System information (as much as possible)

Additional comments

avatar Ruud68 Ruud68 - open - 21 Aug 2025
avatar Ruud68 Ruud68 - change - 21 Aug 2025
Labels Removed: ?
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 21 Aug 2025
Labels Added: No Code Attached Yet
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - labeled - 21 Aug 2025
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 21 Aug 2025

I thought I fixed that
#45911

avatar Ruud68
Ruud68 - comment - 21 Aug 2025
Image
avatar Ruud68
Ruud68 - comment - 21 Aug 2025
avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 21 Aug 2025

@brianteeman The difference between here and the issue fixed by your PR is that here the update information comes from TUF because it's Beta 1, while in your PR (and the corresponding) issue it was from the nightly builds (i.e. XML).

The php_minimum if the custom sections of the Joomla_6.0.0-beta1-Beta-Update_Package.zip target looks right to me.

@SniperSister Any idea why the php_minimum would not be right from the found update in case of TUF source and be right in case of XML (nightly build) source?

avatar SniperSister
SniperSister - comment - 21 Aug 2025

There is an invalid TUF target for the 6.x channel causing the issue, I'll have a look with @HLeithner

avatar Ruud68
Ruud68 - comment - 21 Aug 2025

@SniperSister is this #45953 related to the TUF target?

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 21 Aug 2025

There is an invalid TUF target for the 6.x channel causing the issue, I'll have a look with @HLeithner

@SniperSister Does that also apply to issue #45953 (downgrade to 5.2.1 instead of update to 6.0.0-beta1)?

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 21 Aug 2025

Ah I see @Ruud68 had the same question.

avatar Ruud68
Ruud68 - comment - 21 Aug 2025

for me this is an important question as if that is the case the automatic update could wreak havoc when enabled

avatar SniperSister SniperSister - change - 22 Aug 2025
Status New Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025-08-22 08:54:09
Closed_By SniperSister
avatar SniperSister SniperSister - close - 22 Aug 2025
avatar SniperSister
SniperSister - comment - 22 Aug 2025

See #45964

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment