With the patch applied I see the output date change from "dateModified": "2025-06-10", to "dateModified": "2025-06-10T00:00:00+00:00", and the Rich Results report passes (apart from flagging a Breadcrumbs problem).
But I wonder if this is the right solution. Should we store and output the time?
@ceford I think that's a bit of a question of taste. But I think the date and the correct format are particularly relevant for the search engines.
I am completely neutral here and don't really have an opinion.
Thank you for testing 💚
I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 2a86f07
With the patch applied I see the output date change from "dateModified": "2025-06-10", to "dateModified": "2025-06-10T00:00:00+00:00", and the Rich Results report passes (apart from flagging a Breadcrumbs problem).
But I wonder if this is the right solution. Should we store and output the time?
This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/45581.