User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Hi guys,
this is the sequel of #42368
As detailed here #42368 (comment)
From my point of view "no predefined spacing attribute class" is better then "pe-2" class (or me-2).
Sure, it cannot be "p-2"
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Category | ⇒ | Modules Front End |
Labels |
Added:
PR-4.4-dev
|
Category | Modules Front End | ⇒ | Modules Front End Templates (site) |
thx
@Quy
from my point of view, when a Joomla user is setting the
"Menu Item > Link Type > Link Icon class: ..."
he can add what he wants for spacing the icon: a "pe-2" class or "me-2", "p-2" etc.
So, to add a fixed class in the code it is not a must. To leave it empty means more freedom during the setting.
OR
Anyway, it should be a "pe-2" class and, sure, it cannot be "p-2" attribute class.
Changing to pe-2
would be a better option, otherwise, a padding class must be added to each icon which is not obvious to do without a help description to mention this.
Hi guys,
so, What is the decision here ?
What is your decision as you have not replied to my last comment?
Can you fix this, so that we can test this during PBF?
Title |
|
This pull request has been automatically rebased to 5.2-dev.
Title |
|
You also need to make the same change in templates\cassiopeia\html\mod_menu