? ? Success

User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:

avatar wilsonge
wilsonge
13 Jun 2014

http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=33855&start=0

More Details

Add an optional Application param to the constructor to allow us to unit test things which depend whether we're in the site or the administrator section of the CMS. Added a couple of extra unit tests to demonstrate this improved functionality

Testing

Check pagination continues to work in front and backend. Observe unit tests still pass.

avatar wilsonge wilsonge - open - 13 Jun 2014
avatar wilsonge wilsonge - change - 13 Jun 2014
The description was changed
Title
Paginationtests
Pagination Unit Tests
Description <h2>More Details</h2> <p>Add an optional Application param to the constructor to allow us to unit test things which depend whether we're in the site or the administrator section of the CMS. Added a extra unit test to demonstrate this improved functionality</p> <h2>Testing</h2> <p>Check pagination continues to work in front and backend. Observe unit tests still pass.</p>
Labels Added: ? ?
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - change - 21 Aug 2014
Status New Pending
avatar nicksavov nicksavov - change - 21 Aug 2014
Labels Removed: ?
avatar brianteeman brianteeman - change - 2 Sep 2014
Category Unit Tests
avatar nicksavov nicksavov - change - 16 Oct 2014
Labels Added: ?
avatar nicksavov nicksavov - change - 16 Oct 2014
Labels Added: ?
avatar nicksavov
nicksavov - comment - 16 Oct 2014

Could you update the latest staging?

avatar wilsonge
wilsonge - comment - 16 Oct 2014

merged in staging!

avatar nicksavov
nicksavov - comment - 16 Oct 2014

Thanks George!

avatar mbabker
mbabker - comment - 16 Oct 2014

Merged to 3.4-dev at a1f1c27 since a new param was introduced to the constructor.

avatar mbabker mbabker - close - 16 Oct 2014
avatar mbabker mbabker - change - 16 Oct 2014
Status Pending Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2014-10-16 12:57:27
avatar wilsonge
wilsonge - comment - 16 Oct 2014

You guys should be fairly easily be able to get 100% test coverage with this I think

avatar mbabker
mbabker - comment - 16 Oct 2014

Quality, not quantity :wink:

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment