@Bakual Got confused while checking postgresql. Maybe rewriting this to xml for installation, demodata and update would be an idea. You would end up with only one data source instead of data sources per database engine. The null date would be a placeholder.

Maybe rewriting this to xml for installation, demodata and update would be an idea. You would end up with only one data source instead of data sources per database engine. The null date would be a placeholder.

I agree that the current files have a high chance of introducing errors, and we need to update the same thing in three places.
However rewriting the installer and updater to use a different source is probably not the easiest task. If anyone wants to try a PR, feel free :-)

Looks like Travis is having a bad night as well.

Does this count as a positive test? http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?f=707&t=844801#p3172348

I don't like to track tests in forums. Either post test results here or on the tracker.

Maybe rewriting this to xml for installation, demodata and update would be an idea.

Now this would be a really nice addition.
Maybe those XML exporters and importers that the Joomla! core still contains would gain some attention

See http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=33773&start=0