Please check with an RTL language

@brianteeman sir now you can test the code so that you can merge it if passes.

Alternative approach that conflicts with this PR #32818

Another alternative approach that conflicts with this PR is #32810

@PhilETaylor I have also tested PR #32810. But I got the issue that the cog icon is covering the text, there is no chance that we need to shift this up, we are already facing the issue that this icon covers the text on header and if we will shift this up it will create an another issue. So instead of touching the cog icon I just shifted the search icon group as it will not affect other pages but if we shift cog icon it will have its affect on all other pages.

Its not my decision on which PR the project accepts, I was just bringing it to your, and the maintainers attention that there are multiple, and conflicting, approaches to this issue currently.

@PhilETaylor sure I understand that.

This does not work at all in ltr or rtl as the new classes are a sub of .toggler-toolbar
If we separate the new classes to something like:

@include media-breakpoint-down(sm) {
  .toggler-toolbar {
    top: 20px;
    z-index: $zindex-alerts;

    [dir=ltr] & {
      right: 10px;
    }

    [dir=rtl] & {
      left: 10px;
    }

    .toggler-toolbar-icon::before {
      font: normal normal 900 30px/1 "Font Awesome 5 Free";
      color: var(--toggle-color);
      content: "\f00d";
    }

    &.collapsed .toggler-toolbar-icon::before {
      content: "\f085";
    }
  }

  .input-group {
    margin-right: 70px;
 
    [dir=rtl] & {
      margin-right: auto;
      margin-left: 70px;
    }
  }

  .header {
    margin-bottom: 10px;
  }

  .subhead {
  [...]

Then it works in both ltr and rtl but the results can be weird on some managers.

@infograf768 Ok, So should I change it as you have recommended ?

@manakwadhwa2002 Maybe close your PR in favour of #32810 and focus on another issue?

Honestly, I don't know which is the best solution between this PR and
#32818
#32810

I myself prefer 32810

As @infograf768 stated before, this PR is not working. @manakwadhwa2002 thank you very much for your contribution, we are closing this PR in favour of #32810