As for the accessibility of the articles, I did some tests with the emoticons.
I am using TinyMCE.
To associate a text with the emoticon, I right-clicked on the emoticon and clicked on Insert / editg link. I think it is necessary to fill in the text field (initially empty).
Then I inserted a text:

1. Right click on the smile
2. Insert / editg link
3. I have filled in the title field
4. I clicked on the save button
5. I saved the article

Returning to the Insert / edit link, the title field is empty.

HTML Inspect

Actual result

Returning to (2) it does not save it (empty field).

Expected result

I expected the text in the window and a variation of the HTLM.

@adj9 thanks for testing but please always create a new issue when your are reporting something different

OK, in fact the object deviates a little.

It could come in "features for accessibility".

Bonjour, have you looked at this problem? It's really too small compared to the environment and accessibility of Joomla 4.

@brianteeman Hello I found where this finds this value that for me, for everything remains balanced be at 16px.

Tis is result, that tinymce use his own style. Now you can create /templates/cassopea/css/editor.css with definitions it should be OK

(see related issue)

We have a pull request meanwhile which adds an editor.css for the Cassiopeia template: #31828 .

@Magnytu2 Could you test if that solves your issue here, too? It either needs to have a git clone and npm for testing, or you have to use the packages which have been built for that PR.

@richard67 it's a different request. #31828 correctly makes the css in the editor match the site template. This request was for the text in the editor to be displayed (in the editor) larger.

Hello, I just tested and am not having a problem. It's nice, it's nicer to write and see the text bigger. But I believe it was already fixed in the previous version. I just regret the text which is a bit too stuck on the left. Thank you for your work.

So we can close this issue?

Yes

Closing as having been solved with a past change. I assume it was #31520 where we had increased font size with the system template's editor.css. Thanks for reporting back.