? ?
avatar Gnevyshev
Gnevyshev
15 Apr 2020

Hello!
By analogy with the storage of content (articles) versions, I propose to provide for the storage of versions for HTML modules.
It would be very useful for me! I think, not only for me.

avatar Gnevyshev Gnevyshev - open - 15 Apr 2020
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 15 Apr 2020
Labels Added: ?
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - labeled - 15 Apr 2020
avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 15 Apr 2020

As Joomla 3 is locked for new features, it will go into Joomla 4 if it will be implemented. I will add labels and so on that it's clear that it's a feature request and that it's for Joomla 4.

avatar richard67 richard67 - change - 15 Apr 2020
Build staging 4.0-dev
avatar richard67 richard67 - change - 15 Apr 2020
Category Feature Request
avatar richard67 richard67 - change - 15 Apr 2020
Title
Version storage for the HTML module
[4.0] [Feature Request] Version storage for the HTML module
avatar richard67 richard67 - edited - 15 Apr 2020
avatar richard67 richard67 - change - 15 Apr 2020
Status New Discussion
avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 15 Apr 2020

I am sure this has been discussed before

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 15 Apr 2020

@brianteeman Seems so: #11136 ... and this points to #7019 (comment). Is that still valid?

From my point of view it would not be a small task to integrate modules into content history, and making an own kind of history would be even bigger, so maybe the answer will stay the same as it was.

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 15 Apr 2020

maybe not as I "think" we've broken the connection between ucm and versions now?

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 15 Apr 2020

Hmm, then I am not up to date it seems.

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 15 Apr 2020

Who could know more about that?

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 15 Apr 2020

Not that I am against it ... I think it would be really useful.

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 15 Apr 2020

I was getting confused with a proposal for tags #24551

In which case the original comments are probably still valid.

avatar richard67
richard67 - comment - 15 Apr 2020

Possibly you got confused because it is the same expert for both ;-)

@Hackwar What do you think about content history for (custom html) modules (or their content)? Would that be implementable with a reasonable effort on brain cells, coffee and work time?

avatar Hackwar
Hackwar - comment - 15 Apr 2020

We could look at this in 4.1+. For 4.0 this comes to late.

avatar Gnevyshev
Gnevyshev - comment - 15 Apr 2020

Thank you for interest! I will hope.

avatar SharkyKZ SharkyKZ - change - 15 May 2020
Labels Added: ?
avatar SharkyKZ SharkyKZ - labeled - 15 May 2020
avatar rdeutz rdeutz - change - 18 Dec 2020
Status Discussion Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2020-12-18 10:33:14
Closed_By rdeutz
avatar rdeutz rdeutz - close - 18 Dec 2020

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment