User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
Or perhaps merely a usage fix. "Offuscate" is a real English word, but it's archaic, hasn't been used much since the 17th century. "Obfuscate" is the prevailing term for what this method wants to do.
Pull Request for Issue # .
Status | New | ⇒ | Pending |
Category | ⇒ | Administration com_admin |
hmm looks like Jenkins hangs. I have already contacted Robert about that on Glip. And I'm going to commit that now. Thanks.
Status | Pending | ⇒ | Fixed in Code Base |
Closed_Date | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | ⇒ | 2017-07-11 21:27:51 |
Closed_By | ⇒ | zero-24 | |
Labels |
Added:
?
|
@brianteeman Just FYI: The latest description of it I can find that isn't just "see obfuscate" is in Nathan Bailey's late 18th-century "Universal Etymological English Dictionary." Seems to have appeared in the early 16th century; clung desperately on to the edges of the language a couple of centuries and faded away. One of the many words that never quite made it all the way into the language.
What can I say? I'm a word-nerd.
I have tested this item✅ successfully on 1f481c7
Not even sure it is old Englishe :)
This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/17079.