I can confirm that this is a bug

The bug is that this line which exists so that the page type is only displayed as a filter for site modules is not being processed

https://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/blob/staging/administrator/components/com_modules/models/forms/filter_modules.xml#L55

I have the same issue. Is there a solution for this?

I to have the same issue with J3.7, is there a solution for this? The question should be how soon will there be a solution for this ?

A temp work around or anyone who needs it is to edit /administrator/components/com_modules/models/forms/filter_modules.xml and remove line 55 which is 'showon="client_id:0"' the page filter will reappear for you.

I can confirm this problem also in Joomla 3.7.0

The problem is not solved in J3.7.1

Sorry, but there is a rule here that does not allow to confirm yet an open issue :(

I am looking now for a solution.

@AlexRed i thinks its helpfull to confirm a new issue. It doesn't help if many People confirm after each update that Issue exists.

Hello @franz-wohlkoenig, also I thinks its helpfull to confirm the issue in a new Joomla version, but when I do it I was accused of be a troll 8244#issuecomment-298604672 :(
I believe that if this rule exists, it must be respected for everyone.

@AlexRed @franz-wohlkoenig @communic8
Please test #16118

Closing as we have a patch

also I thinks its helpfull to confirm the issue in a new Joomla version, but when I do it I was accused of be a troll

The issue in your case is you went to several issues which had already been confirmed as issues and had clearly had no action taken on those issues just to state "yep, still an issue". We don't need that kind of reconfirmation on confirmed issues with every release. If/When someone decides to work on the issue, they'd have to confirm they can duplicate it to fix it anyway so at that point if they can't confirm it either they ask for additional info or can close the item.

Yes, it is helpful when a few folks can confirm something, but we don't need a new post of "still an issue" every few days.

sure, not every few days. But can I write after tens of days and for different Joomla version?

As stated by @mbabker no you cannot. It serves no value at all. If it is such a major issue for you then submit a pr or find someone who can.

ok, but this rule is for all or only for me ?

It's a general rule of thumb. Once an issue is confirmed, we don't need people to post on it reminding us that there is an open confirmed issue. Obviously we can't stop people from doing it, but as a courtesy, we ask that you don't. For some the issue will be more important than others, but it will either eventually get fixed or remain in an open and confirmed state.

ok, here I write it: #15621 (comment)
but franz-wohlkoenig say its helpfull to confirm, I know for you and Brian is not helpfull.

When an issue is first opened, it is helpful to test and confirm the issue actually exists. But if we needed to reconfirm every open issue with every release we honestly wouldn't get much else done because we'd spend most of our time retesting 400+ open issues every few weeks.

Maybe if an issue was opened around 3.6.1 or 3.6.2 it'd be good to reconfirm it. But for something opened during the 3.7 beta/RC or after 3.7.0, not so much.

ok, like I write here: "Sorry, but there is a rule here that does not allow to confirm yet an open issue :("

ok to reconfirm it for old issue.

I can't speak for the workflow of others, but in my case, I manage and monitor GitHub almost exclusively through email for projects where I have some kind of maintainership role, which means I'm getting email notifications for everything (commit comments, new commits on PRs, new issues/PRs, items being closed). It adds to the amount of time I have to spend in my email clearing my queue when there is a stream of "issue still exists" messages. For items that are still fairly new, I don't feel like those messages are adding any value. When it's an older issue (I'd say 3-4 months old minimum), it can be helpful.

ok, I hope all we can use this rule.

The other way around would be more helpful, I am pretty sure a lot of the 500 issues we have are obsolet so we could close them. If someone would go to the old ones and commenting when an issue is no longer valid then we could concentrate on the valid ones.

For example the issue where brian accuses me of being a troll is 564 day old. It's right to be accused or just right reconfirm it for old issue.

Now I confirm one old 146 day, is it ok? #13365 (comment)

THIS IS CRAZY OVER 20 NOTIFICATIONS IN AN HOUR NONE IF WHICH RELATE TO THE ISSUE.. you have gone totally off topic, this isn't a bitching forum about how git hub or the joomla Dec team handles bug reports. It's about a specific issue to which I posted a work around to 10 days ago. Please STOP COMMENTING UNLESS IT'S TO ADD SOMETHING MEANINGFUL TO THE ISSUE.

ps I know I've just added to the mails and for that I'm sorry but hopefully everyone will be respectful and get back on topic.