[#1474] - Memcached bug 2.5.x
- Closed
- 31 May 2014
- Medium
- Build: 2.5.x
- # 1474
- Diff
- madasha:memcached-bug-2.5.x
User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:
These changes modify the session and cache memcache(d) configuration and conf values usage in the following ways:
- Separate conf variables introduced for memcache(d) host and port for cache and session, since it is possible to use different memcache servers (one for cache, another for session).
- Server conf usage problems fixed in libraries/joomla/session/storage/memcache.php and libraries/joomla/session/storage/memcached.php in order to ensure proper construction of the storage objects and correct usage of the configuration values.
- Related with the previous changes, the 'memcache' fieldset has been eliminated (no longer appended to the 'cache' form) and the corresponding memcache(d) fields have been added to the 'session' and 'cache' fieldsets.
Thanks for your contribution - At this time we are only using github as the place to submit code fixes, the actual reporting of issues and testing fixes is still taking place on Joomlacode.
As it has been some time since you opened this issue can you please confirm that it is still valid with the current Master or Joomla 3.2 beta. If it is no longer valid then please can you close this issue. Otherwise please can you:
1) Open an item on the Joomlacode tracker in the appropriate area.
CMS Bug Reports: http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=8103
CMS Feature Requests: http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=8549
2) After submitting the item to the Joomlacode tracker, add a link to the Joomlacode tracker item here and make sure that you add a link to this GitHub issue or pull request on the joomlacode tracker item.
Here is the Tracker item for this: http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=31406&start=0
And PR #1473 is somehow related to this. Could you please close one of these 2?
Tested and works as expected.