well, imho, if you have https://example.com and https://www.example.com you should be making HTTP 301 redirects to your prefered domain via web server, not adding canonical domains.

@andrepereiradasilva I agree with you about that but for the purpose of how this plugin works it should be noted that they are separate domains

@andrepereiradasilva I agree with you about that but for the purpose of how this plugin works it should be noted that they are separate domains
Show all checks

Yes i understand, but i really think you should use different domains as example not www.example.com and his naked domain version. Because if you are doing this, imho you are not doing it right ?

I was trying to show that they are different domains as well and not just
the obvious a.com and b.com

On 19 October 2016 at 14:28, andrepereiradasilva notifications@github.com
wrote:

@andrepereiradasilva https://github.com/andrepereiradasilva I agree
with you about that but for the purpose of how this plugin works it should
be noted that they are separate domains
Show all checks

Yes i understand, but i really think you should use different domains as
example not www.example.com and his naked domain. Because if you are
doing this, imho you are not doing it right ?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#12472 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPH8VXjHLvdUOWHurxvs88Ag_0O-JQrks5q1hsbgaJpZM4Ka64a
.

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
https://brian.teeman.net/ http://brian.teeman.net/

agree with andre. this is confusing. please use different domains

It is deliberate to show that they are different domains - sorry but I am
not going to change that - so it either gets accepted or rejected but I am
not changing it

On 19 October 2016 at 16:20, infograf768 notifications@github.com wrote:

agree with andre. this is confusing. please use different domains

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#12472 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPH8dRYCmonb2ZI2y-BoslVHi_-OvGgks5q1jU3gaJpZM4Ka64a
.

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
https://brian.teeman.net/ http://brian.teeman.net/

Brian's right here. It needs to be clear that example.com and www.example.com, though most DNS configurations by default alias it to act in this way, are NOT one in the same. And yes users need to be aware of SEO implications of not standardizing on one and redirecting the other, but that part's outside the scope of what can be done in Joomla.

As is, this tooltip reads fine to me.

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on f005352

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on f005352

Totally agree with this patch.

Tested successfully at PBF NL

RTC

Thanks