? ? Success

User tests: Successful: Unsuccessful:

avatar 810
810
12 Sep 2016

There should be no visual improvements or negative views.

This pr can be merged by checking code

avatar 810 810 - open - 12 Sep 2016
avatar 810 810 - change - 12 Sep 2016
Status New Pending
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 12 Sep 2016
Category Templates (admin) Administration Templates (site) Front End
avatar joomla-cms-bot joomla-cms-bot - change - 12 Sep 2016
Labels Added: ? ?
avatar joomla-cms-bot
joomla-cms-bot - comment - 12 Sep 2016

Please add more information to your issue. Without test instructions and/or any description we will close this issue within 4 weeks. Thanks.
This is an automated message from the J!Tracker Application.

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 12 Sep 2016

Editing bootstrap files is not an option

On 12 September 2016 at 14:12, Joomla! CMS Bot notifications@github.com
wrote:

Please add more information to your issue. Without test instructions
and/or any description we will close this issue within 4 weeks. Thanks.
This is an automated message from the J!Tracker Application
https://github.com/joomla/jissues.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#12018 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPH8fUboVBfBXzO-wJmIaiooWorJP7dks5qpU-7gaJpZM4J6kTm
.

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

avatar 810
810 - comment - 12 Sep 2016

why not, Bootstrap 2x is deprecated. Its just a small issue. I can remove the fix on bootstrap file.

avatar mbabker
mbabker - comment - 12 Sep 2016

You know what? We've already core hacked or forked so many other libraries, INCLUDING Bootstrap. Why bother continuing to treat it like sacred ground that can't be touched when the project has already proven that it can't pull a third party dependency without hacking it?

avatar brianteeman
brianteeman - comment - 12 Sep 2016

Other people may be using the bootsstrap.css in their extensions

On 12 September 2016 at 14:24, Michael Babker notifications@github.com
wrote:

You know what? We've already core hacked or forked so many other
libraries, INCLUDING Bootstrap. Why bother continuing to treat it like
sacred ground that can't be touched when the project has already proven
that it can't pull a third party dependency without hacking it?


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#12018 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPH8bqo-R3GiN7fiZLi6QPNL8DFG1Ctks5qpVKFgaJpZM4J6kTm
.

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

avatar mbabker
mbabker - comment - 12 Sep 2016

Other people may be using Chosen in their extensions yet 08f116c was merged with all required hacks for the sake of backward compatibility (so in effect forking the project).

Our hacks in these libraries have already caused enough issues. joomla/joomla-websites#569 is one example of a perceived bug because there is a major behavioral difference between the Joomla! Bootstrap Framework and the Twitter Bootstrap Framework.

avatar C-Lodder
C-Lodder - comment - 12 Sep 2016

This is NOT a duplicate, it's a fallback. If the browser doesn't support rgba(), it will fallback to #ccc

Same applies for things like background gradients, for example:

background: #1e5799;
background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #1e5799 0%,#7db9e8 100%);

So no, this is not an issue at all.

avatar 810
810 - comment - 12 Sep 2016

@C-Lodder thnx for the info, will close it

avatar 810 810 - change - 12 Sep 2016
Status Pending Closed
Closed_Date 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2016-09-12 14:26:19
Closed_By 810
avatar 810 810 - close - 12 Sep 2016

Add a Comment

Login with GitHub to post a comment